404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31927043)
1. Quality and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Information on Laser Treatments for Urinary Incontinence: What Is Available to Our Patients?
Perruzza D; Jolliffe C; Butti A; McCaffrey C; Kung R; Gagnon L; Lee P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 31927043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment of available Internet information on early orthodontic treatment.
Alpaydin MT; Alpaydin T; Koklu M; Buyuk SK
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):351. PubMed ID: 38504213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information.
Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.
Ahmadi O; Louw J; Leinonen H; Gan PYC
Br J Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 35(5):551-554. PubMed ID: 33769170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality and readability of web-based Arabic health information on COVID-19: an infodemiological study.
Halboub E; Al-Ak'hali MS; Al-Mekhlafi HM; Alhajj MN
BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 33461516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Web-Based Health Information Following the Renewal of the Cervical Screening Program in Australia: Evaluation of Readability, Understandability, and Credibility.
Mac OA; Thayre A; Tan S; Dodd RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e16701. PubMed ID: 32442134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
