59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31927408)
1. Evaluation of uterine cervical cancer in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study.
Vasques RB; Carramenha LL; Basílio I; Leão MEB; Carvalho GPSL; Amaral RMC; Rezende-Filho J; Guerra Neto NGM; Furtado YL
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():35-39. PubMed ID: 31927408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a population of pregnant women with an abnormal cytology.
Pruski D; Malkowska-Walczak B; Paluszkiewicz A; Kędzia W
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(1):20-23. PubMed ID: 28157250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Dufloth RM; do Vale DB; Tavares TA; Zeferino LC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Apr; 175():103-6. PubMed ID: 24522115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age Specific Cytological Abnormalities in Women Screened for Cervical Cancer in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.
Al Zaabi M; Al Muqbali S; Al Sayadi T; Al Ameeri S; Coetsee K; Balayah Z; Ortashi O
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(15):6375-9. PubMed ID: 26434845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix with human papilloma virus infection among young women aged less than 25 years.
Ryu KJ; Lee S; Min KJ; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):959-963. PubMed ID: 27714942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Study of Pap Smears in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Women from a Tertiary Care Center in South India.
Gupta K; Philipose CS; Rai S; Ramapuram J; Kaur G; Kini H; Gv C; Adiga D
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 30721904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between concurrent genital bleeding and cervical cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Vale DB; Zeferino LC; Dufloth RM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Sep; 94(9):949-53. PubMed ID: 26033639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV genotyping in women with high-grade cervical lesions: evidence for improving the cervical cancer screening strategy in China.
Xu H; Lin A; Shao X; Shi W; Zhang Y; Yan W
Oncotarget; 2016 Dec; 7(50):83775-83783. PubMed ID: 27626178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of pre-malignant cervical lesions in females presenting with abnormal pelvic complaints.
Tahir QA; Bukhari MH
J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Feb; 70(2):272-275. PubMed ID: 32063620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural History of Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Pregnancy and Mode of Delivery.
Schuster S; Joura E; Kohlberger P
Anticancer Res; 2018 Apr; 38(4):2439-2442. PubMed ID: 29599374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Why does the prevalence of cytopathological results of cervical cancer screening can vary significantly between two regions of Brazil?].
Discacciati MG; Barboza BM; Zeferino LC
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2014 May; 36(5):192-7. PubMed ID: 25003469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ström P; Ploner A; Elfström KM; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J; Sparén P
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i276. PubMed ID: 26869597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Quality of Pap Smears from the Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Program According to the Human Development Index.
Costa RFA; Longatto-Filho A; de Lima Vazquez F; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JHTG
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Mar; 13(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 31836602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the LC-1000 Flow Cytometry Screening System for Cervical Cancer Screening in Routine Health Checkups.
Heo I; Kwak HJ; Nah EH; Cho S; Kim S; Cho HI
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):279-287. PubMed ID: 29843120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HPV genotyping for triage of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results: a multicenter prospective study.
Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K; Satoh T; Nishide K; Nozue A; Shimabukuro K; Endo S; Nagai K; Oki A; Ochi H; Morishita Y; Noguchi M; Yoshikawa H
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Oct; 20(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 25652908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical Cancer Screening Services at Tertiary Healthcare Facility: An Alternative Approach.
Dhanasekaran K; Verma C; Kumar V; Hariprasad R; Gupta R; Gupta S; Mehrotra R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1265-1269. PubMed ID: 31030504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the clinical significance of human papillomavirus (HPV) 53.
Padalko E; Ali-Risasi C; Van Renterghem L; Bamelis M; De Mey A; Sturtewagen Y; Vastenavond H; Vanden Broeck D; Weyers S; Praet M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():7-9. PubMed ID: 26026728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
