These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31927684)

  • 1. A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Chen Y; Culpepper S; Liang F
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):121-153. PubMed ID: 31927684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restricted Latent Class Models for Nominal Response Data: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):592-625. PubMed ID: 38114767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifiability of Hidden Markov Models for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Jun; 88(2):361-386. PubMed ID: 36797538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifiability of Latent Class Models with Covariates.
    Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 35254608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generic Identifiability of the DINA Model and Blessing of Latent Dependence.
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):117-131. PubMed ID: 36167947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Fang G; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 30673967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Going Deep in Diagnostic Modeling: Deep Cognitive Diagnostic Models (DeepCDMs).
    Gu Y
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; 89(1):118-150. PubMed ID: 38079062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):158-174. PubMed ID: 35896935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploratory Restricted Latent Class Models with Monotonicity Requirements under PÒLYA-GAMMA Data Augmentation.
    Balamuta JJ; Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):903-945. PubMed ID: 35023017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the Number of Attributes for the Exploratory DINA Model.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):30-64. PubMed ID: 33751367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.
    Gu Y; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):468-483. PubMed ID: 29728918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferring Latent Structure in Polytomous Data with a Higher-Order Diagnostic Model.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):368-386. PubMed ID: 34699299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Global identifiability of latent class models with applications to diagnostic test accuracy studies: A Gröbner basis approach.
    Duan R; Cao M; Ning Y; Zhu M; Zhang B; McDermott A; Chu H; Zhou X; Moore JH; Ibrahim JG; Scharfstein DO; Chen Y
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31444807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-Stage maximum likelihood estimation in the misspecified restricted latent class model.
    Wang S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):300-333. PubMed ID: 29080215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extending exploratory diagnostic classification models: Inferring the effect of covariates.
    Yigit HD; Culpepper SA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):372-401. PubMed ID: 36601975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latent variable sdelection in multidimensional item response theory models using the expectation model selection algorithm.
    Xu PF; Shang L; Zheng QZ; Shan N; Tang ML
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 May; 75(2):363-394. PubMed ID: 34918834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.