These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3192805)
1. Future directions for research on materials and design of dental implants. Smith DC J Dent Educ; 1988 Dec; 52(12):815-20. PubMed ID: 3192805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Future directions in dental implant materials research. Young FA J Dent Educ; 1988 Dec; 52(12):770-4. PubMed ID: 3192802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():207-15. PubMed ID: 19663966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface. Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study. Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Future directions in the use of dental implants. Bloem TJ Shigaku; 1989 Oct; 77(SPEC):1289-92. PubMed ID: 2489297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface modifications of dental implants. Stanford CM Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1():S26-33. PubMed ID: 18498581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant surfaces and design (Working Group 4). Lang NP; Jepsen S; Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():228-31. PubMed ID: 19663968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]