These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31928263)
1. Effect of perineum protection cooperated by two operators in the forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study. Wan L; Xia W; Zhang J J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 31928263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience. Yamasato K; Kimata C; Chern I; Clappier M; Burlingame J J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(21):3568-3573. PubMed ID: 31744361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Christianson LM; Bovbjerg VE; McDavitt EC; Hullfish KL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 12861171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Bradley MS; Kaminski RJ; Streitman DC; Dunn SL; Krans EE Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 122(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 23743462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulation Training for Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery and Rates of Maternal Perineal Trauma. Gossett DR; Gilchrist-Scott D; Wayne DB; Gerber SE Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 128(3):429-435. PubMed ID: 27500334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Suzor forceps training by studying obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a retrospective study. Coste Mazeau P; Boukeffa N; Ticaud Boileau N; Huet S; Traverse M; Eyraud JL; Laguerre A; Catalan C; Riedl C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):674. PubMed ID: 33167939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study. Simic M; Cnattingius S; Petersson G; Sandström A; Stephansson O BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Feb; 17(1):72. PubMed ID: 28222704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Meister MR; Cahill AG; Conner SN; Woolfolk CL; Lowder JL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):310.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26902989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between obstetrician forceps volume and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Miller ES; Barber EL; McDonald KD; Gossett DR Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):248-254. PubMed ID: 24402600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries]. Courtois L; Becher P; Maticot-Baptista D; Cour A; Zurlinden B; Millet P; Maisonnette-Escot Y; Riethmuller D; Maillet R J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 May; 37(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 18093747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India. Gundabattula SR; Surampudi K Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 28681174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]