These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31928375)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the United States.
    Haddad R; Cohen EEW; Venkatachalam M; Young K; Singh P; Shaw JW; Korytowsky B; Abraham P; Harrington KJ
    J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):442-447. PubMed ID: 31928375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
    Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of head and neck cancer.
    Hirschmann A; Lupatsch JE; Schwenkglenks M; Panje CM; Matter-Walstra K; Espeli V; Dedes KJ; Siano M;
    Oral Oncol; 2018 Dec; 87():104-110. PubMed ID: 30527224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Recurrent Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Zargar M; McFarlane T; Chan KKW; Wong WWL
    Oncologist; 2018 Feb; 23(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 29021380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus the EXTREME regimen in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ye D; Liang X; Chen X; Li Y
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6807. PubMed ID: 38514766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab for Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
    Tringale KR; Carroll KT; Zakeri K; Sacco AG; Barnachea L; Murphy JD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 May; 110(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 29126314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nivolumab vs investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression.
    Ferris RL; Blumenschein G; Fayette J; Guigay J; Colevas AD; Licitra L; Harrington KJ; Kasper S; Vokes EE; Even C; Worden F; Saba NF; Docampo LCI; Haddad R; Rordorf T; Kiyota N; Tahara M; Lynch M; Jayaprakash V; Li L; Gillison ML
    Oral Oncol; 2018 Jun; 81():45-51. PubMed ID: 29884413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Sarfaty M; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
    Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):628-634. PubMed ID: 28807351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
    Wan X; Zhang Y; Tan C; Zeng X; Peng L
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Apr; 5(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 30789633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trial.
    Harrington KJ; Ferris RL; Blumenschein G; Colevas AD; Fayette J; Licitra L; Kasper S; Even C; Vokes EE; Worden F; Saba NF; Kiyota N; Haddad R; Tahara M; Grünwald V; Shaw JW; Monga M; Lynch M; Taylor F; DeRosa M; Morrissey L; Cocks K; Gillison ML; Guigay J
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Aug; 18(8):1104-1115. PubMed ID: 28651929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nivolumab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Efficacy and Safety in CheckMate 141 by Prior Cetuximab Use.
    Ferris RL; Licitra L; Fayette J; Even C; Blumenschein G; Harrington KJ; Guigay J; Vokes EE; Saba NF; Haddad R; Ramkumar S; Russell J; Brossart P; Tahara M; Colevas AD; Concha-Benavente F; Lynch M; Li L; Gillison ML
    Clin Cancer Res; 2019 Sep; 25(17):5221-5230. PubMed ID: 31239321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Q-TWiST Analysis Comparing Nivolumab and Therapy of Investigator's Choice in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Platinum-Refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
    Cocks K; Contente M; Simpson S; DeRosa M; Taylor FC; Shaw JW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 30972702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Vs Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
    Watson TR; Gao X; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2016144. PubMed ID: 33052401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line treatment of stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.
    Berling M; Chaudhary MA; Yuan Y; Varol N; Dale P; Testa E; Klint J; Lee A; Lubinga SJ; Penrod JR
    J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):703-711. PubMed ID: 35659172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nivolumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
    Raphael J; Sun Z; Bjarnason GA; Helou J; Sander B; Naimark DM
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Dec; 41(12):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 29727313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CheckMate 141: 1-Year Update and Subgroup Analysis of Nivolumab as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.
    Gillison ML; Blumenschein G; Fayette J; Guigay J; Colevas AD; Licitra L; Harrington KJ; Kasper S; Vokes EE; Even C; Worden F; Saba NF; Iglesias Docampo LC; Haddad R; Rordorf T; Kiyota N; Tahara M; Monga M; Lynch M; Li L; Ferris RL
    Oncologist; 2018 Sep; 23(9):1079-1082. PubMed ID: 29866947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab versus surveillance for the adjuvant treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma who are at high risk of recurrence: a US payer perspective.
    Brodtkorb TH; Knight C; Kamgar F; Teitsson S; Kurt M; Patel MY; Poretta T; Mamtani R; Palmer S
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):543-553. PubMed ID: 38470512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age.
    Saba NF; Blumenschein G; Guigay J; Licitra L; Fayette J; Harrington KJ; Kiyota N; Gillison ML; Ferris RL; Jayaprakash V; Li L; Brossart P
    Oral Oncol; 2019 Sep; 96():7-14. PubMed ID: 31422216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cost-effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma patients in England.
    Meng Y; Hertel N; Ellis J; Morais E; Johnson H; Philips Z; Roskell N; Walker A; Lee D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1163-1172. PubMed ID: 29524005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for American patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Ye ZM; Tang ZQ; Xu Z; Zhou Q; Li H
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():947375. PubMed ID: 35937220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.