BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31929531)

  • 1. Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric.
    Freedberg M; Reeves JA; Hussain SJ; Zaghloul KA; Wassermann EM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0216185. PubMed ID: 31929531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A structured ICA-based process for removing auditory evoked potentials.
    Ross JM; Ozdemir RA; Lian SJ; Fried PJ; Schmitt EM; Inouye SK; Pascual-Leone A; Shafi MM
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1391. PubMed ID: 35082350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies.
    Conde V; Tomasevic L; Akopian I; Stanek K; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Bergmann TO; Siebner HR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 185():300-312. PubMed ID: 30347282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties.
    Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; Farzan F; Fitzgibbon BM; Bailey NW; Hernandez-Pavon JC; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():425-39. PubMed ID: 25067813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cortical EEG responses to realistic sham versus real TMS of human motor cortex.
    Gordon PC; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner C; Ziemann U
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 30143417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Biabani M; Fornito A; Coxon JP; Fulcher BD; Rogasch NC
    J Physiol; 2021 Jun; 599(11):2907-2932. PubMed ID: 33599980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evoked EEG Responses to TMS Targeting Regions Outside the Primary Motor Cortex and Their Test-Retest Reliability.
    Song Y; Gordon PC; Metsomaa J; Rostami M; Belardinelli P; Ziemann U
    Brain Topogr; 2024 Jan; 37(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 37996562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials.
    Biabani M; Fornito A; Mutanen TP; Morrow J; Rogasch NC
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1537-1552. PubMed ID: 31377097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recording brain responses to TMS of primary motor cortex by EEG - utility of an optimized sham procedure.
    Gordon PC; Jovellar DB; Song Y; Zrenner C; Belardinelli P; Siebner HR; Ziemann U
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118708. PubMed ID: 34743050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disentangling EEG responses to TMS due to cortical and peripheral activations.
    Rocchi L; Di Santo A; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Casula E; Rawji V; Di Lazzaro V; Koch G; Rothwell J
    Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 33127580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artifact correction and source analysis of early electroencephalographic responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over primary motor cortex.
    Litvak V; Komssi S; Scherg M; Hoechstetter K; Classen J; Zaaroor M; Pratt H; Kahkonen S
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 17574872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the Origin of TMS-evoked Brain Potentials Using Topographic Analysis.
    Sulcova D; Salatino A; Ivanoiu A; Mouraux A
    Brain Topogr; 2022 Nov; 35(5-6):583-598. PubMed ID: 36289133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG.
    Romero Lauro LJ; Rosanova M; Mattavelli G; Convento S; Pisoni A; Opitz A; Bolognini N; Vallar G
    Cortex; 2014 Sep; 58():99-111. PubMed ID: 24998337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TMS-related potentials and artifacts in combined TMS-EEG measurements: Comparison of three different TMS devices.
    Van Doren J; Langguth B; Schecklmann M
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2015 May; 45(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 25892330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-latency artifacts associated with concurrent TMS-EEG.
    Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Nov; 6(6):868-76. PubMed ID: 23651674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolating sensory artifacts in the suprathreshold TMS-EEG signal over DLPFC.
    Poorganji M; Zomorrodi R; Hawco C; Hill AT; Hadas I; Zrenner C; Rajji TK; Chen R; Voineskos D; Blumberger DM; Daskalakis ZJ
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6796. PubMed ID: 37100795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.
    Ahn S; Fröhlich F
    Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(2):304-315. PubMed ID: 33516859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.
    Petrichella S; Johnson N; He B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174879. PubMed ID: 28384197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity using concurrent TMS-EEG: a feasibility study.
    Fernandez L; Biabani M; Do M; Opie GM; Hill AT; Barham MP; Teo WP; Byrne LK; Rogasch NC; Enticott PG
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1768-1787. PubMed ID: 33788622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study.
    Bonato C; Miniussi C; Rossini PM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1699-707. PubMed ID: 16797232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.