These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31930462)

  • 1. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
    Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
    Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study.
    Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S;
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Carer Social Care-Related Quality of Life Outcomes: Estimating English Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers.
    Batchelder L; Malley J; Burge P; Lu H; Saloniki EC; Linnosmaa I; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
    Value Health; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1427-1440. PubMed ID: 31806200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
    Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
    Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Huls SPI; Lancsar E; Donkers B; Ride J
    Health Econ; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2630-2647. PubMed ID: 36102864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does one size fit all? Assessing the preferences of older and younger people for attributes of quality of life.
    Ratcliffe J; Lancsar E; Flint T; Kaambwa B; Walker R; Lewin G; Luszcz M; Cameron ID
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Feb; 26(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 27553968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valuing informal carers' quality of life using best-worst scaling-Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer).
    Nguyen L; Jokimäki H; Linnosmaa I; Saloniki EC; Batchelder L; Malley J; Lu H; Burge P; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2022 Apr; 23(3):357-374. PubMed ID: 34468882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling.
    Aschmann HE; Puhan MA; Robbins CW; Bayliss EA; Chan WV; Mularski RA; Wilson RF; Bennett WL; Sheehan OC; Yu T; Yebyo HG; Leff B; Tabano H; Armacost K; Glover C; Maslow K; Mintz S; Boyd CM
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 31856842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
    Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling.
    Dionise ZR; Gonzalez JM; Garcia-Roig ML; Kirsch AJ; Scales CD; Wiener JS; Purves JT; Routh JC
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):86.e1-86.e9. PubMed ID: 33309608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eliciting older people's preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment.
    Franco MR; Howard K; Sherrington C; Ferreira PH; Rose J; Gomes JL; Ferreira ML
    J Physiother; 2015 Jan; 61(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.
    Erdem S; Campbell D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
    Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
    Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure.
    Saloniki EC; Malley J; Burge P; Lu H; Batchelder L; Linnosmaa I; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 30945131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.
    Howell M; Wong G; Rose J; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008163. PubMed ID: 26810994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.