These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931025)

  • 1. A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy.
    Daly S; Newcombe RG; Claydon NCA; Seong J; Davies M; West NX
    J Dent; 2020 Feb; 93():103279. PubMed ID: 31931025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' perception of pain during ultrasonic debridement: a comparison between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers.
    Muhney KA; Dechow PC
    J Dent Hyg; 2010; 84(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 21047464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative questionnaire study of patient complaint levels between magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler (Cavitron
    Ikeda Y; Kawada A; Tanaka D; Ikeda E; Kobayashi H; Iwata T
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2021 Aug; 19(3):273-278. PubMed ID: 33219589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19329455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heat generation during ultrasonic instrumentation of dentin as affected by different irrigation methods.
    Nicoll BK; Peters RJ
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):884-8. PubMed ID: 9736371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of subgingival irrigation with chlorhexidine during ultrasonic scaling.
    Chapple IL; Walmsley AD; Saxby MS; Moscrop H
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 1403587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the effects of four different power scalers on enamel tooth surface in the dog.
    Brine EJ; Marretta SM; Pijanowski GJ; Siegel AM
    J Vet Dent; 2000 Mar; 17(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11968928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the Vector scaling unit in supportive periodontal therapy: a subjective patient evaluation.
    Hoffman A; Marshall RI; Bartold PM
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 32(10):1089-93. PubMed ID: 16174273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pain perception during debridement of hypersensitive teeth elicited by two ultrasonic scalers.
    Müller S; Huber H; Goebel G; Wimmer G; Kapferer-Seebacher I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 27743214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 12795788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16367854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of scaler tip design on root surface roughness, tooth substance loss and patients' pain perception: an in vitro and a randomised clinical trial.
    Abdul Hayei NA; Yahya NA; Safii SH; Saub R; Vaithilingam RD; Baharuddin NA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 33789646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19017036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical use of an aerosol-reduction device with an ultrasonic scaler.
    Harrel SK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Dec; 17(12):1185-93; quiz 1194. PubMed ID: 9161132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy of subgingival scaling of the molars with conventional scalers in vitro].
    Chen MH; Yin YZ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2017 Feb; 26(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 28474067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aerosol generation by two ultrasonic scalers and one sonic scaler. A comparative study.
    Gross KB; Overman PR; Cobb C; Brockmann S
    J Dent Hyg; 1992 Sep; 66(7):314-8. PubMed ID: 1291635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 30(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 14629574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.