These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931025)

  • 21. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of loading on the vibration characteristics of thin magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler inserts.
    Trenter SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1308-15. PubMed ID: 14584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Periodontal healing after non-surgical therapy with a modified sonic scaler: a controlled clinical trial.
    Christgau M; Männer T; Beuer S; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 33(10):749-58. PubMed ID: 16889629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of instrument power setting during ultrasonic scaling upon treatment outcome.
    Chapple IL; Walmsley AD; Saxby MS; Moscrop H
    J Periodontol; 1995 Sep; 66(9):756-60. PubMed ID: 7500240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective intensity of pain during supportive periodontal treatment using a sonic scaler or an Er:YAG laser.
    Braun A; Jepsen S; Deimling D; Ratka-Krüger P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 20447257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology.
    Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ;
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lack of antimicrobial effect on periodontopathic bacteria by ultrasonic and sonic scalers in vitro.
    Schenk G; Flemmig TF; Lob S; Ruckdeschel G; Hickel R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Feb; 27(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 10703657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variability of sonic scaling tip movement.
    Shah S; Walmsley AD; Chapple IL; Lumley PJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Nov; 21(10):705-9. PubMed ID: 7852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Ultrasonic and sonic scalers in periodontics. A review].
    Thilo B; Chapuis B; Pernet D; Baehni P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 2181646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Periodontal healing after scaling and root planing with the Kavo Sonicflex and Titan-S sonic scalers.
    Laurell L
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 2255995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasonic subgingival root planing and EDTA etching in a one-step procedure.
    Blomlöf J; Blomlöf L; Lindskog S
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(6):213-9. PubMed ID: 9505333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sharpening of ultrasonic scalers.
    Checchi L; Pelliccioni GA; D'Achille C
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Aug; 18(7):505-7. PubMed ID: 1894743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review.
    Arabaci T; Ciçek Y; Canakçi CF
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Feb; 5(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17250573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 25(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 9495615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments.
    Kocher T; Rodemerk B; Fanghänel J; Meissner G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 15842271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the ultrasonic dental scaler insert.
    Trenter SC; Walmsley AD; Landini G; Shippen JM
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Mar; 24(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11886833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The performance characteristics of a piezoelectric ultrasonic dental scaler.
    Pecheva E; Sammons RL; Walmsley AD
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Feb; 38(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 26654578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro evaluation of temperature changes in the root canal induced by ultrasonic scalers.
    Van der Velden U; Koster TJ; Feilzer AJ; Timmerman MF; Van der Weijden GA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 May; 13(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24902857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.