These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931144)

  • 1. A Novel Technique to Minimize Contamination for Cervical Cancer Surgery Patients.
    Martino MA; Bixel K; Johnson AM; Wejkszner T; Jacobs A; Lazaro J; Makarova E; Thomas MB; Fowler J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1624-1630. PubMed ID: 31931144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
    Frumovitz M; Obermair A; Coleman RL; Pareja R; Lopez A; Ribero R; Isla D; Rendon G; Bernardini MQ; Buda A; Moretti-Marquez R; Zevallos A; Vieira MA; Zhu T; Land RP; Nicklin J; Asher R; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Ramirez PT
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):851-860. PubMed ID: 32502445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.
    Lago V; Tiermes M; Padilla-Iserte P; Matute L; Gurrea M; Domingo S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 32540498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transvaginal cervical tumor-concealing no-look no-touch technique in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a novel operation technique.
    Kanao H; Fusegi A; Omi M; Youssefzadeh AC; Nomura H; Matsuo K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e27. PubMed ID: 36562133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
    Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
    Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Chen S; Zheng Y; Tong L; Zhao X; Chen L; Wang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1471-1472. PubMed ID: 31926301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.