These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931247)

  • 1. Influence of Lumbar Stenosis Surgery on Sacroiliac Joint Pain-Long-Term Results.
    Freeman TB; Bach K; Murtagh RD
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Apr; 136():e386-e392. PubMed ID: 31931247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient sacroiliac joint-related pain is a common problem following lumbar decompressive surgery without instrumentation.
    Schomacher M; Kunhardt O; Koeppen D; Moskopp D; Kienapfel H; Kroppenstedt S; Cabraja M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Dec; 139():81-5. PubMed ID: 26397213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Interspinous Spacer Outcomes in Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Clinical Study.
    Abdel Ghany W; Amer A; Saeed K; Emara E; Hamad A; Nosseir M; Dawood O; Nada MA
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():556-564.e3. PubMed ID: 27514696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
    Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
    Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum 10-year outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Iguchi T; Kurihara A; Nakayama J; Sato K; Kurosaka M; Yamasaki K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(14):1754-9. PubMed ID: 10888941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparation of efficacy between unilateral laminectomy approach bilateral decompression and traditional total laminectomy decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].
    Hu W; Zhao J; Gong C; Zou M; Yuan JH; Liu XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 96(21):1673-6. PubMed ID: 27290708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale.
    Takahashi H; Aoki Y; Saito J; Nakajima A; Sonobe M; Akatsu Y; Inoue M; Taniguchi S; Yamada M; Koyama K; Yamamoto K; Shiga Y; Inage K; Orita S; Maki S; Furuya T; Koda M; Yamazaki M; Ohtori S; Nakagawa K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):100. PubMed ID: 30832643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Groin pain associated with sacroiliac joint dysfunction and lumbar disorders.
    Kurosawa D; Murakami E; Aizawa T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 161():104-109. PubMed ID: 28866262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decompression only versus fusion surgery for lumbar stenosis in elderly patients over 75 years old: which is reasonable?
    Lee CH; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2013; 53(12):870-4. PubMed ID: 24172588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of spinal decompression on back pain in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Srinivas S; Paquet J; Bailey C; Nataraj A; Stratton A; Johnson M; Salo P; Christie S; Fisher C; Hall H; Manson N; Rampersaud YR; Thomas K; McIntosh G; Dea N
    Spine J; 2019 Jun; 19(6):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 30664950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.
    Rainov NG; Schneiderhan R; Heidecke V
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 30564865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Schnake KJ; Schaeren S; Jeanneret B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16481955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.