231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931747)
1. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.
Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of machine learning softwares to screen titles of systematic reviews: a methodological study.
Dos Reis AHS; de Oliveira ALM; Fritsch C; Zouch J; Ferreira P; Polese JC
Syst Rev; 2023 Apr; 12(1):68. PubMed ID: 37061711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research.
Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC
ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis.
Cowie K; Rahmatullah A; Hardy N; Holub K; Kallmes K
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e33219. PubMed ID: 35499859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
Tsou AY; Treadwell JR; Erinoff E; Schoelles K
Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 32241297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Features and functioning of Data Abstraction Assistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews.
Jap J; Saldanha IJ; Smith BT; Lau J; Schmid CH; Li T;
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 30325115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
Gartlehner G; Wagner G; Lux L; Affengruber L; Dobrescu A; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):277. PubMed ID: 31727159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review.
Waffenschmidt S; Knelangen M; Sieben W; Bühn S; Pieper D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):132. PubMed ID: 31253092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are systematic review and guideline development tools useful? A Guidelines International Network survey of user preferences.
Munn Z; Brandt L; Kuijpers T; Whittington C; Wiles L; Karge T;
JBI Evid Implement; 2020 Sep; 18(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 32487964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.
Finch M; Featherston R; Chakraborty S; Bjørndal L; Mildon R; Albers B; Fiennes C; Taylor DJA; Schachtman R; Yang T; Shlonsky A
Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 17(1):e1139. PubMed ID: 37133265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.
Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing the efficiency of study selection for systematic reviews using prioritization tools and a single-screening approach.
Waffenschmidt S; Sieben W; Jakubeit T; Knelangen M; Overesch I; Bühn S; Pieper D; Skoetz N; Hausner E
Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):161. PubMed ID: 37705060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.
Gates M; Pillay J; Nuspl M; Wingert A; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):51. PubMed ID: 36945065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews.
Wang Z; Nayfeh T; Tetzlaff J; O'Blenis P; Murad MH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227742. PubMed ID: 31935267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
