These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31931747)

  • 21. Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.
    Yao X; Kumar MV; Su E; Flores Miranda A; Saha A; Sussman J
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102511. PubMed ID: 38071872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
    Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan.
    Olofsson H; Brolund A; Hellberg C; Silverstein R; Stenström K; Österberg M; Dagerhamn J
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 28374510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design.
    Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Title, abstract, and keyword searching resulted in poor recovery of articles in systematic reviews of epidemiologic practice.
    Penning de Vries BBL; van Smeden M; Rosendaal FR; Groenwold RHH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():55-61. PubMed ID: 31982541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of person-centred care on patient safety: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
    Rossiter C; Levett-Jones T; Pich J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Sep; 109():103658. PubMed ID: 32593882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.
    Rees S; Williams A
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.
    Hennessy EA; Tanner-Smith EE; Finch AJ; Sathe N; Kugley S
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-86. PubMed ID: 37131375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unsupervised title and abstract screening for systematic review: a retrospective case-study using topic modelling methodology.
    Natukunda A; Muchene LK
    Syst Rev; 2023 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 36597132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to structure Microsoft Excel documents for systematic reviews.
    Godino L
    Nurse Res; 2023 Mar; 31(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 36856031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial.
    Gartlehner G; Affengruber L; Titscher V; Noel-Storr A; Dooley G; Ballarini N; König F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():20-28. PubMed ID: 31972274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
    Cierco Jimenez R; Lee T; Rosillo N; Cordova R; Cree IA; Gonzalez A; Indave Ruiz BI
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):322. PubMed ID: 36522637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A mapping exercise using automated techniques to develop a search strategy to identify systematic review tools.
    Sutton A; O'Keefe H; Johnson EE; Marshall C
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):874-881. PubMed ID: 37669905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Catchii: Empowering literature review screening in healthcare.
    Halman A; Oshlack A
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):157-165. PubMed ID: 37771210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references.
    McKeown S; Mir ZM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 33485394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Non-familial intergenerational interventions and their impact on social and mental wellbeing of both younger and older people-A mapping review and evidence and gap map.
    Campbell F; Whear R; Rogers M; Sutton A; Robinson-Carter E; Barlow J; Sharpe R; Cohen S; Wolstenholme L; Thompson-Coon J
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 19(1):e1306. PubMed ID: 36913218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.