146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31932005)
1. [Grading of prostate cancer. For a more precise prognosis].
Algaba F
Rev Esp Patol; 2020; 53(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31932005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cribriform architecture has worse prognostic features than non-cribriform-type.
Au S; Villamil CF; Alaghehbandan R; Wang G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2019 Apr; 39():59-62. PubMed ID: 30772651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.
Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Steyerberg EW; Bangma CH; Incrocci L; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Mod Pathol; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 28530220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].
Kristiansen G; Egevad L; Amin M; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA; Epstein JI;
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26809207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinicopathological features of prostate ductal carcinoma: matching analysis and comparison with prostate acinar carcinoma.
Kim A; Kwon T; You D; Jeong IG; Go H; Cho YM; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 25829805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of prostate cancer histopathology.
Compérat E
Curr Opin Urol; 2019 Nov; 29(6):587-592. PubMed ID: 31453865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rijstenberg LL; Hansum T; Hollemans E; Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Histopathology; 2020 Nov; 77(5):742-748. PubMed ID: 32542746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Not all gleason pattern 4 prostate cancers are created equal: A study of latent prostatic carcinomas in a cystoprostatectomy and autopsy series.
Siadat F; Sykes J; Zlotta AR; Aldaoud N; Egawa S; Pushkar D; Kuk C; Bristow RG; Montironi R; van der Kwast T
Prostate; 2015 Sep; 75(12):1277-84. PubMed ID: 25963383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups.
van Leenders GJLH; Kweldam CF; Hollemans E; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Verhoef EI; Remmers S; Incrocci L; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2020 Feb; 77(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 31439369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.
Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
Int J Biol Markers; 2018 Nov; 33(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 29945478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicopathological analysis of intraductal proliferative lesions of prostate: intraductal carcinoma of prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and atypical cribriform lesion.
Miyai K; Divatia MK; Shen SS; Miles BJ; Ayala AG; Ro JY
Hum Pathol; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1572-81. PubMed ID: 24842280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland: Recent Advances.
Divatia MK; Ro JY
Yonsei Med J; 2016 Sep; 57(5):1054-62. PubMed ID: 27401634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma and large cribriform carcinoma architecture after prostatectomy in a contemporary cohort.
Trudel D; Downes MR; Sykes J; Kron KJ; Trachtenberg J; van der Kwast TH
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 50(9):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24703897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive form of invasive carcinoma and should be graded.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley JR; Billis A; Bostwick DG; Camparo P; Cheng L; Clouston D; Denham J; Furusato B; Hartmann A; Jufe L; Kench J; Kenwright DN; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; MacLennan GT; Merrimen J; Moch H; Oxley J; Pan CC; Paner G; Ro J; Sesterhenn IAM; Shanks J; Thunders M; Tsuzuki T; Wheeler T; Yaxley JW; Varma M
Pathology; 2020 Feb; 52(2):192-196. PubMed ID: 31843189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between cribriform/intraductal prostatic adenocarcinoma and percent Gleason pattern 4 to a 22-gene genomic classifier.
Taylor AS; Morgan TM; Wallington DG; Chinnaiyan AM; Spratt DE; Mehra R
Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 31737920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Can Be Further Optimized: Analysis of the Relative Prognostic Strength of Individual Architectural Patterns in 1275 Patients From the Canary Retrospective Cohort.
McKenney JK; Wei W; Hawley S; Auman H; Newcomb LF; Boyer HD; Fazli L; Simko J; Hurtado-Coll A; Troyer DA; Tretiakova MS; Vakar-Lopez F; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Gleave ME; Lance RS; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; True LD; Feng Z; Brooks JD
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Nov; 40(11):1439-1456. PubMed ID: 27635949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
