These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31932171)

  • 1. Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Assessment and Management of Stable Chest Pain: Rationale and Design of the FORECAST Trial.
    Mahmoudi M; Nicholas Z; Nuttall J; Bresser M; Maishman T; Berry C; Hlatky MA; Douglas P; Rajani R; Fox K; Curzen N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jul; 21(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 31932171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFR
    Curzen NP; Nolan J; Zaman AG; Nørgaard BL; Rajani R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 27568119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial.
    Curzen N; Nicholas Z; Stuart B; Wilding S; Hill K; Shambrook J; Eminton Z; Ball D; Barrett C; Johnson L; Nuttall J; Fox K; Connolly D; O'Kane P; Hobson A; Chauhan A; Uren N; Mccann G; Berry C; Carter J; Roobottom C; Mamas M; Rajani R; Ford I; Douglas P; Hlatky M
    Eur Heart J; 2021 Oct; 42(37):3844-3852. PubMed ID: 34269376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFR
    Rønnow Sand NP; Nissen L; Winther S; Petersen SE; Westra J; Christiansen EH; Larsen P; Holm NR; Isaksen C; Urbonaviciene G; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr; 13(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 31422146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
    Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and Rationale of the RIPCORD 2 Trial (Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?): A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Routine Pressure Wire Assessment With Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Elguindy M; Stables R; Nicholas Z; Kemp I; Curzen N
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 Feb; 11(2):e004191. PubMed ID: 29449442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional and Anatomical Testing in Intermediate Risk Chest Pain Patients with a High Coronary Calcium Score: Rationale and Design of the FACC Study.
    Øvrehus KA; Veien KT; Lambrechtsen J; Rohold A; Steffensen FH; Gerke O; Jensen LO; Mickley H
    Cardiology; 2019; 142(3):141-148. PubMed ID: 31170719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact on stable chest pain pathways of CT fractional flow reserve.
    O'Leary RA; Burn J; Urwin SG; Sims AJ; Beattie A; Bagnall A
    Heart; 2023 Aug; 109(18):1380-1386. PubMed ID: 37080766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study.
    Sand NPR; Veien KT; Nielsen SS; Nørgaard BL; Larsen P; Johansen A; Hess S; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Junker A; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Jensen LO
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1640-1650. PubMed ID: 29909103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rationale, design and goals of the HeartFlow assessing diagnostic value of non-invasive FFR
    Chinnaiyan KM; Akasaka T; Amano T; Bax JJ; Blanke P; De Bruyne B; Kawasaki T; Leipsic J; Matsuo H; Morino Y; Nieman K; Norgaard BL; Patel MR; Pontone G; Rabbat M; Rogers C; Sand NP; Raff G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28017291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with acute chest pain: Subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT II trial.
    Ferencik M; Lu MT; Mayrhofer T; Puchner SB; Liu T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Ghemigian K; Ivanov A; Adami E; Nagurney JT; Woodard PK; Truong QA; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 31113728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD.
    Nørgaard BL; Hjort J; Gaur S; Hansson N; Bøtker HE; Leipsic J; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Pedersen K; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Gormsen LC; Mæng M; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Jensen JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 27085447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
    Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Use of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Emergency Department.
    Chinnaiyan KM; Safian RD; Gallagher ML; George J; Dixon SR; Bilolikar AN; Abbas AE; Shoukfeh M; Brodsky M; Stewart J; Cami E; Forst D; Timmis S; Crile J; Raff GL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):452-461. PubMed ID: 31326487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality-of-Life and Economic Outcomes of Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve With Computed Tomography Angiography: PLATFORM.
    Hlatky MA; De Bruyne B; Pontone G; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; Douglas PS;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2315-2323. PubMed ID: 26475205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary computed tomography angiography derived fractional flow reserve and risk of recurrent angina: A 3-year follow-up study.
    Madsen KT; Nørgaard BL; Øvrehus KA; Jensen JM; Parner E; Grove EL; Mortensen MB; Fairbairn TA; Nieman K; Patel MR; Rogers C; Mullen S; Mickley H; Thomsen KK; Bøtker HE; Leipsic J; Sand NPR
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(3):243-250. PubMed ID: 38246785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
    Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI.
    Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.