BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31932393)

  • 1. Protocol for a prospective, controlled, cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of ambulatory monitoring systems in the prompt detection of hypoxia and during movement.
    Areia C; Vollam S; Piper P; King E; Ede J; Young L; Santos M; Pimentel MAF; Roman C; Harford M; Shah A; Gustafson O; Rowland M; Tarassenko L; Watkinson PJ
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e034404. PubMed ID: 31932393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Chest Patch for Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring: Clinical Validation Study During Movement and Controlled Hypoxia.
    Morgado Areia C; Santos M; Vollam S; Pimentel M; Young L; Roman C; Ede J; Piper P; King E; Gustafson O; Harford M; Shah A; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Sep; 23(9):e27547. PubMed ID: 34524087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Use of Wearable Pulse Oximeters in the Prompt Detection of Hypoxemia and During Movement: Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
    Santos M; Vollam S; Pimentel MA; Areia C; Young L; Roman C; Ede J; Piper P; King E; Harford M; Shah A; Gustafson O; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Feb; 24(2):e28890. PubMed ID: 35166690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wearability Testing of Ambulatory Vital Sign Monitoring Devices: Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
    Areia C; Young L; Vollam S; Ede J; Santos M; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e20214. PubMed ID: 33325827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of a wearable wireless patch for continuous remote monitoring of vital signs in patients recovering from major surgery: a clinical validation study from the TRaCINg trial.
    Downey C; Ng S; Jayne D; Wong D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e031150. PubMed ID: 31420399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ChroniSense National Early Warning Score Study (CHESS): a wearable wrist device to measure vital signs in hospitalised patients-protocol and study design.
    Van Velthoven MH; Adjei F; Vavoulis D; Wells G; Brindley D; Kardos A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e028219. PubMed ID: 31542738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review.
    Leenen JPL; Leerentveld C; van Dijk JD; van Westreenen HL; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e18636. PubMed ID: 32469323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ChroniSense National Early Warning Score Study: Comparison Study of a Wearable Wrist Device to Measure Vital Signs in Patients Who Are Hospitalized.
    Van Velthoven MH; Oke J; Kardos A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e40226. PubMed ID: 36745491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs in the General Ward Using Wearable Devices: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Weenk M; Bredie SJ; Koeneman M; Hesselink G; van Goor H; van de Belt TH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e15471. PubMed ID: 32519972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patch validation: an observational study protocol for the evaluation of a multisignal wearable sensor in patients during anaesthesia and in the postanaesthesia care unit.
    Le Guen M; Squara P; Ma S; Adjavon S; Trillat B; Merzoug M; Aegerter P; Fischler M
    BMJ Open; 2020 Sep; 10(9):e040453. PubMed ID: 32978206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: A qualitative study in patients and nurses.
    Areia C; King E; Ede J; Young L; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P; Vollam S
    J Adv Nurs; 2022 Mar; 78(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 34655093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Downey C; Randell R; Brown J; Jayne DG
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10802. PubMed ID: 30538086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of non-invasive continuous physiological monitoring devices for neonates in Nairobi, Kenya: a research protocol.
    Ginsburg AS; Nkwopara E; Macharia W; Ochieng R; Waiyego M; Zhou G; Karasik R; Xu S; Ansermino JM
    BMJ Open; 2020 Apr; 10(4):e035184. PubMed ID: 32284391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stressing the accuracy: Wrist-worn wearable sensor validation over different conditions.
    Menghini L; Gianfranchi E; Cellini N; Patron E; Tagliabue M; Sarlo M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13441. PubMed ID: 31332802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study.
    Breteler MJM; Huizinga E; van Loon K; Leenen LPH; Dohmen DAJ; Kalkman CJ; Blokhuis TJ
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e020162. PubMed ID: 29487076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are current wireless monitoring systems capable of detecting adverse events in high-risk surgical patients? A descriptive study.
    Breteler MJM; KleinJan E; Numan L; Ruurda JP; Van Hillegersberg R; Leenen LPH; Hermans M; Kalkman CJ; Blokhuis TJ
    Injury; 2020 May; 51 Suppl 2():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 31761422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of physiological deterioration by the SNAP40 wearable device compared to standard monitoring devices in the emergency department: the SNAP40-ED study.
    Reed MJ; McGrath M; Black PL; Lewis S; McCann C; Whiting S; O'Brien R; Grant A; Harrison B; Skyrme L; Odam M
    Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():18. PubMed ID: 31093566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and Evaluation of Novel Textile Wearable Systems for the Surveillance of Vital Signals.
    Trindade IG; Machado da Silva J; Miguel R; Pereira M; Lucas J; Oliveira L; Valentim B; Barreto J; Santos Silva M
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Sep; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 27669263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of severe adverse event from vital signs for post-operative patients.
    Gu Y; Rasmussen SM; Molgaard J; Haahr-Raunkjar C; Meyhoff CS; Aasvang EK; Sorensen HBD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():971-974. PubMed ID: 34891450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vital Signs Monitoring with Wearable Sensors in High-risk Surgical Patients: A Clinical Validation Study.
    Breteler MJM; KleinJan EJ; Dohmen DAJ; Leenen LPH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; van Loon K; Blokhuis TJ; Kalkman CJ
    Anesthesiology; 2020 Mar; 132(3):424-439. PubMed ID: 31743149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.