BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31933437)

  • 1. Neural Signatures of Learning Novel Object-Scene Associations.
    Smith CM; Federmeier KD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):783-803. PubMed ID: 31933437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple mechanisms of visual prediction as revealed by the timecourse of scene-object facilitation.
    Smith CM; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2024 May; 61(5):e14503. PubMed ID: 38178793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related changes in the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during visual object recognition: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Lai LY; Frömer R; Festa EK; Heindel WC
    Neurobiol Aging; 2020 Oct; 94():38-49. PubMed ID: 32562874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age effects on the neural processing of object-context associations in briefly flashed natural scenes.
    Rémy F; Vayssière N; Saint-Aubert L; Bacon-Macé N; Pariente J; Barbeau E; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jan; 136():107264. PubMed ID: 31734227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect.
    Lauer T; Willenbockel V; Maffongelli L; Võ ML
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Sep; 394():112812. PubMed ID: 32682913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are incongruent objects harder to identify? The functional significance of the N300 component.
    Truman A; Mudrik L
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():222-232. PubMed ID: 29885960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple synergistic effects of emotion and memory on proactive processes leading to scene recognition.
    Schettino A; Loeys T; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():81-95. PubMed ID: 23664944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects.
    Dyck M; Brodeur MB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jun; 72():43-51. PubMed ID: 25911127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes.
    Sun HM; Simon-Dack SL; Gordon RD; Teder WA
    Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 1398():40-54. PubMed ID: 21621195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.
    Coco MI; Nuthmann A; Dimigen O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):571-589. PubMed ID: 31765602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fate of object memory traces under change detection and change blindness.
    Busch NA
    Brain Res; 2013 Jul; 1520():107-15. PubMed ID: 23685191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: replication and extension.
    Mudrik L; Shalgi S; Lamy D; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():447-58. PubMed ID: 24593900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Older adults can use memory for distinctive objects, but not distinctive scenes, to rescue associative memory deficits.
    Bouffard NR; Fidalgo C; Brunec IK; Lee ACH; Barense MD
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2024; 31(2):362-386. PubMed ID: 36703496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory scene context facilitates visual recognition of objects in consistent visual scenes.
    Niimi R; Saiki T; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 36977906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic Scene-Object Consistency Modulates N300/400 EEG Components, but Does Not Automatically Facilitate Object Representations.
    Chen L; Cichy RM; Kaiser D
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Aug; 32(16):3553-3567. PubMed ID: 34891169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of behavioral relevance on the processing of global scene properties: An ERP study.
    Hansen NE; Noesen BT; Nador JD; Harel A
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():168-180. PubMed ID: 29729276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP correlates of spatially incongruent object identification during scene viewing: contextual expectancy versus simultaneous processing.
    Demiral SB; Malcolm GL; Henderson JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1271-85. PubMed ID: 22391475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.
    Brandman T; Peelen MV
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7700-7710. PubMed ID: 28687603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The probability of object-scene co-occurrence influences object identification processes.
    Sauvé G; Harmand M; Vanni L; Brodeur MB
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2167-2179. PubMed ID: 28432384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic Attention Capture by Threatening, But Not by Semantically Incongruent Natural Scene Images.
    Furtak M; Doradzińska Ł; Ptashynska A; Mudrik L; Nowicka A; Bola M
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Jun; 30(7):4158-4168. PubMed ID: 32198506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.