These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3193372)

  • 21. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospects for speech pattern element aids.
    Fourcin A
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():257-67. PubMed ID: 2192533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of adaptive multimicrophone algorithms for hearing aids.
    Chazan D; Medan Y; Shvadron U
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 3430370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vibrotactile stimulation: case study with a profoundly deaf child.
    Geers AE
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 3958992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Rehabilitation of hearing aid-fitted deaf individuals. Case of the hearing aid-fitted deaf child before acquisition of speech].
    Ziegler L
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1966; 20(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 5932672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC; Thibodeau LM; Whalen HS; Overson GJ
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Speech rehabilitation of children with severe and profound deafness using the verbo-tonal method].
    Motta G; Iengo M; Tranchino G; Motta G; D'Angelo L; Salafia M; Vecchio O; Villari F; Plutino I; Cervelli G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1987; 7 Suppl 15():1-15. PubMed ID: 3453582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Selected problems in the rehabilitation of young children with severe hearing loss].
    Sobieszczańska-Radoszewska L; Siedlecka H; Emiluta-Rozya D; Zalewska M
    Probl Med Wieku Rozwoj; 1983; 12():269-72. PubMed ID: 6674979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnosis and improvement of oral development of polish children with an impaired hearing system.
    Zielińska J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 105():231-40. PubMed ID: 15718612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Lejeune B; Demanez L
    B-ENT; 2006; 2(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16910289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The language healing system of deaf children based on wavelet transform].
    Bu F; Yu P; Cao P; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 18(3):438-40. PubMed ID: 11605511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC; Schwander TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.
    Geers A; Brenner C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):2S-14S. PubMed ID: 12612476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM; Beijk CM; Brokx JP; van den Borne S; van den Broek P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid.
    Weiss M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical evaluation procedure to assess and remediate speech perception skills.
    Vergara KC; Miskiel LW; Oller DK; Eilers RE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():70-6. PubMed ID: 9428049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Principles of automatic processing of speech signals and their application in medical technology and for aids for handicapped.
    Mangold H
    Med Prog Technol; 1988; 14(1):39-56. PubMed ID: 2976877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T; Levitt H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Context effects in auditory training with children.
    Hnath-Chisolm T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():64-9. PubMed ID: 9428048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.