These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31934574)

  • 1. A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix.
    Kashanian M; Bahasadri S; Nejat Dehkordy A; Sheikhansari N; Eshraghi N
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2019; 33():115. PubMed ID: 31934574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the efficacy of dilapan with extra-amniotic saline infusion and oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in term pregnancies.
    Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Sheikhansari N; Eshraghi N
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5616-5620. PubMed ID: 33622151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
    Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Tabasi Z; Mesdaghinia E; Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M; Sehat M; Panahandeh A
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2020 May; 63(3):261-269. PubMed ID: 32489970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Mullin PM; House M; Paul RH; Wing DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 12388962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
    Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamarudzman N; Omar SZ; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101142. PubMed ID: 37643690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized controlled trial of foley catheter, extra-amniotic saline infusion and prostaglandin e2 suppository for labor induction.
    Ghanaie MM; Jafarabadi M; Milani F; Asgary SA; Karkan MF
    J Family Reprod Health; 2013 Jun; 7(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 24971103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Vengalil SR; Guinn DA; Olabi NF; Burd LI; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 May; 91(5 Pt 1):774-9. PubMed ID: 9572229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the effect of extra-amniotic normal saline infusion alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the induction of labor.
    Kashanian M; Fekrat M; Naghghash S; Ansari NS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Feb; 34(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 18226128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
    Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sharma C; Jaryal S; Soni A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101026. PubMed ID: 37211088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.