172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31935594)
1. Diffusion-weighted imaging of cervical cancer: Feasibility of ultra-high b-value at 3T.
Qi YF; He YL; Lin CY; Wang XQ; Zhou HL; Yuan L; Li Y; Xiang Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 124():108779. PubMed ID: 31935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging in the pelvis at 3T-A feasibility study.
Thian YL; Xie W; Porter DA; Weileng Ang B
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 24594423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal brain at 3T.
Cihangiroglu M; Uluğ AM; Firat Z; Bayram A; Kovanlikaya A; Kovanlikaya I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18162352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis.
Wetter A; Nensa F; Lipponer C; Guberina N; Olbricht T; Schenck M; Schlosser TW; Gratz M; Lauenstein TC
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1009-15. PubMed ID: 25168023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation.
Liu Y; Zhang Y; Cheng R; Liu S; Qu F; Yin X; Wang Q; Xiao B; Ye Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 29761595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of cervical cancer and benign cervical lesions at 3.0T: Comparison with routine MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Kuang F; Yan Z; Li H; Feng H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1094-9. PubMed ID: 25824638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Hindman N; Lim RP; Das K; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Taneja SS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23371846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of uterine cervical cancer: a prospective study evaluating the benefits of DWI compared to conventional MR sequences in a 3T environment.
Exner M; Kühn A; Stumpp P; Höckel M; Horn LC; Kahn T; Brandmaier P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jul; 57(7):869-77. PubMed ID: 26329683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image Quality Assessment of 2D
Hausmann D; Liu J; Budjan J; Reichert M; Ong M; Meyer M; Smakic A; Grimm R; Strecker R; Schoenberg SO; Wang X; Attenberger UI
Anticancer Res; 2018 Feb; 38(2):969-978. PubMed ID: 29374729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zoomed echo-planar imaging using parallel transmission: impact on image quality of diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3T.
Rosenkrantz AB; Chandarana H; Pfeuffer J; Triolo MJ; Shaikh MB; Mossa DJ; Geppert C
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 24962196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of the quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted mri in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears.
Park HJ; Lee SY; Rho MH; Kim MS; Kwon HJ; Chung EC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 27079566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting tumor recurrence in patients with cervical carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: value of quantitative histogram analysis on diffusion-weighted MR images.
Erbay G; Onal C; Karadeli E; Guler OC; Arica S; Koc Z
Acta Radiol; 2017 Apr; 58(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 27445314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Erbay G; Guler OC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of Computed Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Optimization of b-value in Cervical Cancer.
Moribata Y; Kido A; Fujimoto K; Himoto Y; Kurata Y; Shitano F; Kiguchi K; Konishi I; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Jan; 16(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 27646153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cervical Cancer With Different b-Values.
Wu Q; Wang Y; Shi L; Dong L; Liu M; Dou S; Zhu S; Wang M; Shi D
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 27997440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulating Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Screening in Oncologic Tertiary Prevention: A Prospective Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study.
Dreher C; Kuder TA; König F; Paech D; Tavakoli A; Laun FB; Flothow F; Gnirs R; Benkert T; Nickel D; Strecker R; Schlemmer HP; Bickelhaupt S
Invest Radiol; 2019 Nov; 54(11):704-711. PubMed ID: 31356384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T?
Metens T; Miranda D; Absil J; Matos C
Eur Radiol; 2012 Mar; 22(3):703-9. PubMed ID: 21971824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration.
Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
