These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31935658)

  • 1. On the time course of spatial cueing: Dissociating between a set for fast reorienting and a set for cue-target segregation.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103004. PubMed ID: 31935658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set.
    Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Fu X; Weng X
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 19693533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
    Kasten R; Navon D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the putative role of intervening events in exogenous attention.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Botta F; De Haro V; Lupiáñez J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):808-815. PubMed ID: 31720780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modulation of spatial congruency by object-based attention: analysing the "locus" of the modulation.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2455-69. PubMed ID: 21923623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.
    Fischer B; Weber H
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of spatial Stroop by object-based attention but not by space-based attention.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Funes MJ; Fu X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):516-30. PubMed ID: 19565432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return.
    Souto D; Born S; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 29520712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probing the time course of facilitation and inhibition in gaze cueing of attention in an upper-limb reaching task.
    Yoxon E; Constable MD; Welsh TN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2410-2423. PubMed ID: 31338823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaze-cueing and endogenous attention operate in parallel.
    Slessor G; Finnerty A; Papp J; Smith DT; Martin D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():172-180. PubMed ID: 30529928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return and attentional control settings.
    Gibson BS; Amelio J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 10909240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.
    Santangelo V; Van der Lubbe RH; Belardinelli MO; Postma A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 16489435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.