These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31935832)

  • 1. Individual Differences in Aesthetic Preferences for Multi-Sensorial Stimulation.
    Gao J; Soranzo A
    Vision (Basel); 2020 Jan; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 31935832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects.
    Soranzo A; Petrelli D; Ciolfi L; Reidy J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Dec; 71(12):2586-2602. PubMed ID: 29364061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Complex Story: Universal Preference vs. Individual Differences Shaping Aesthetic Response to Fractals Patterns.
    Street N; Forsythe AM; Reilly R; Taylor R; Helmy MS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():213. PubMed ID: 27252634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying Q-Methodology to Investigate People' Preferences for Multivariate Stimuli.
    Gao J; Soranzo A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():556509. PubMed ID: 33362621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Aesthetic Preference for Nature Sounds Depends on Sound Object Recognition.
    Van Hedger SC; Nusbaum HC; Heald SLM; Huang A; Kotabe HP; Berman MG
    Cogn Sci; 2019 May; 43(5):e12734. PubMed ID: 31087588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stronger shared taste for natural aesthetic domains than for artifacts of human culture.
    Vessel EA; Maurer N; Denker AH; Starr GG
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():121-131. PubMed ID: 29936343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taxonomy of Individual Variations in Aesthetic Responses to Fractal Patterns.
    Spehar B; Walker N; Taylor RP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():350. PubMed ID: 27458365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?
    Höfel L; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jul; 65(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 17400317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateral biases in aesthetic and spatial location judgments: differences between tasks and native reading directions.
    Smith AK; Duerksen KN; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    Laterality; 2020 Jan; 25(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 30732541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling aesthetics to support an ecosystem services approach for natural resource management decision making.
    Booth PN; Law SA; Ma J; Buonagurio J; Boyd J; Turnley J
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Sep; 13(5):926-938. PubMed ID: 28418204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual Differences in Aesthetic Ability: The Case for an Aesthetic Quotient.
    Myszkowski N; Zenasni F
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():750. PubMed ID: 27242647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.
    Leder H; Nadal M
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):443-64. PubMed ID: 25280118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome.
    den Hartog L; Raghoebar GM; Slater JJ; Stellingsma K; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 21815991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuroscience of aesthetics.
    Chatterjee A; Vartanian O
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2016 Apr; 1369(1):172-94. PubMed ID: 27037898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speed of person perception affects immediate and ongoing aesthetic evaluation.
    Khaw MW; Nichols P; Freedberg D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():166-176. PubMed ID: 31173999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the electrophysiology of aesthetic processing.
    Jacobsen T
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 204():159-68. PubMed ID: 24041323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation.
    Karim AKMR; Likova LT
    IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging; 2018; 2018():. PubMed ID: 31497677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personality-assisted Multi-task Learning for Generic and Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment.
    Li L; Zhu H; Zhao S; Ding G; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 31995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aesthetics of streetscapes: influence of fundamental properties on aesthetic judgments of urban space.
    Weber R; Schnier J; Jacobsen T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):128-46. PubMed ID: 18459363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of aesthetic responses to music and their underlying neural and psychological mechanisms.
    Nieminen S; Istók E; Brattico E; Tervaniemi M; Huotilainen M
    Cortex; 2011 Oct; 47(9):1138-46. PubMed ID: 21665202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.