These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31937184)

  • 1. Using discrete choice experiments to develop and deliver patient-centered psychological interventions: a systematic review.
    McGrady ME; Pai ALH; Prosser LA
    Health Psychol Rev; 2021 Jun; 15(2):314-332. PubMed ID: 31937184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
    Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
    Williams G; Kinchin I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
    Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
    Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.
    Clark MD; Determann D; Petrou S; Moro D; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2014 Sep; 32(9):883-902. PubMed ID: 25005924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring Relative Preferences for HIV Service Features Using Discrete Choice Experiments: a Synthetic Review.
    Eshun-Wilson I; Kim HY; Schwartz S; Conte M; Glidden DV; Geng EH
    Curr HIV/AIDS Rep; 2020 Oct; 17(5):467-477. PubMed ID: 32860150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
    Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
    Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Wortley S; Wong G; Kieu A; Howard K
    Patient; 2014; 7(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 24652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
    Karim S; Craig BM; Vass C; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Oct; 40(10):943-956. PubMed ID: 35960434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
    Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
    Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
    Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care.
    Pfarr C; Schmid A; Schneider U
    Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 2014; 12():27-48. PubMed ID: 24864381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions.
    Burton CD; Entwistle VA; Elliott AM; Krucien N; Porteous T; Ryan M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Apr; 7(4):e015689. PubMed ID: 28446527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.