These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31937245)

  • 61. Statistical Approach for Improving Genomic Prediction Accuracy through Efficient Diagnostic Measure of Influential Observation.
    Budhlakoti N; Rai A; Mishra DC
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8408. PubMed ID: 32439883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Efficiency of genomic prediction across two Eucalyptus nitens seed orchards with different selection histories.
    Suontama M; Klápště J; Telfer E; Graham N; Stovold T; Low C; McKinley R; Dungey H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Mar; 122(3):370-379. PubMed ID: 29980794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The impact of population structure on genomic prediction in stratified populations.
    Guo Z; Tucker DM; Basten CJ; Gandhi H; Ersoz E; Guo B; Xu Z; Wang D; Gay G
    Theor Appl Genet; 2014 Mar; 127(3):749-62. PubMed ID: 24452438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Regularized multi-trait multi-locus linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection in crops.
    Lozano AC; Ding H; Abe N; Lipka AE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Oct; 24(1):399. PubMed ID: 37884874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Early prediction of biomass in hybrid rye based on hyperspectral data surpasses genomic predictability in less-related breeding material.
    Galán RJ; Bernal-Vasquez AM; Jebsen C; Piepho HP; Thorwarth P; Steffan P; Gordillo A; Miedaner T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1409-1422. PubMed ID: 33630103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.
    Crossa J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Cuevas J; Montesinos-López O; Jarquín D; de Los Campos G; Burgueño J; González-Camacho JM; Pérez-Elizalde S; Beyene Y; Dreisigacker S; Singh R; Zhang X; Gowda M; Roorkiwal M; Rutkoski J; Varshney RK
    Trends Plant Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(11):961-975. PubMed ID: 28965742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.
    Schopp P; Riedelsheimer C; Utz HF; Schön CC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Nov; 128(11):2189-201. PubMed ID: 26231985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes.
    Guo J; Khan J; Pradhan S; Shahi D; Khan N; Avci M; Mcbreen J; Harrison S; Brown-Guedira G; Murphy JP; Johnson J; Mergoum M; Esten Mason R; Ibrahim AMH; Sutton R; Griffey C; Babar MA
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 33126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Deep learning versus parametric and ensemble methods for genomic prediction of complex phenotypes.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Gianola D; Peñagaricano F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Feb; 52(1):12. PubMed ID: 32093611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Determination of the optimal number of markers and individuals in a training population necessary for maximum prediction accuracy in F
    Peixoto LA; Bhering LL; Cruz CD
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Nov; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27886337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of methods and marker Systems in Genomic Selection of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.).
    Kwong QB; Teh CK; Ong AL; Chew FT; Mayes S; Kulaveerasingam H; Tammi M; Yeoh SH; Appleton DR; Harikrishna JA
    BMC Genet; 2017 Dec; 18(1):107. PubMed ID: 29228905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures.
    Akbarpour T; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N; Shadparvar AA
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2021 Jan; 296(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 32995954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.
    Badke YM; Bates RO; Ernst CW; Fix J; Steibel JP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 24531728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Genomic Prediction Within and Among Doubled-Haploid Libraries from Maize Landraces.
    Brauner PC; Müller D; Schopp P; Böhm J; Bauer E; Schön CC; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1185-1196. PubMed ID: 30257934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat.
    Edwards SM; Buntjer JB; Jackson R; Bentley AR; Lage J; Byrne E; Burt C; Jack P; Berry S; Flatman E; Poupard B; Smith S; Hayes C; Gaynor RC; Gorjanc G; Howell P; Ober E; Mackay IJ; Hickey JM
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Jul; 132(7):1943-1952. PubMed ID: 30888431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Phenotypic Data from Inbred Parents Can Improve Genomic Prediction in Pearl Millet Hybrids.
    Liang Z; Gupta SK; Yeh CT; Zhang Y; Ngu DW; Kumar R; Patil HT; Mungra KD; Yadav DV; Rathore A; Srivastava RK; Gupta R; Yang J; Varshney RK; Schnable PS; Schnable JC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2513-2522. PubMed ID: 29794163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Use of multiple traits genomic prediction, genotype by environment interactions and spatial effect to improve prediction accuracy in yield data.
    Tsai HY; Cericola F; Edriss V; Andersen JR; Orabi J; Jensen JD; Jahoor A; Janss L; Jensen J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232665. PubMed ID: 32401769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.