These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31937697)

  • 1. Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines.
    Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2020 Jan; 57(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 31937697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology.
    Assel M; Sjoberg D; Elders A; Wang X; Huo D; Botchway A; Delfino K; Fan Y; Zhao Z; Koyama T; Hollenbeck B; Qin R; Zahnd W; Zabor EC; Kattan MW; Vickers AJ
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 30537407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review.
    Wu R; Glen P; Ramsay T; Martel G
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():70. PubMed ID: 24972453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of evidence published in clinical journals: signs of change?
    Newcombe RG; Stebbing J
    Postgrad Med J; 2006 Jun; 82(968):355-6. PubMed ID: 16754701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology.
    Assel M; Sjoberg D; Elders A; Wang X; Huo D; Botchway A; Delfino K; Fan Y; Zhao Z; Koyama T; Hollenbeck B; Qin R; Zahnd W; Zabor EC; Kattan MW; Vickers AJ
    Eur Urol; 2019 Mar; 75(3):358-367. PubMed ID: 30580902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical analysis of the use of statistical tests in Brazilian publications related to digestive tract surgery.
    Orso IR; Pereira JC; D'Albuquerque LA; Cecconello I; Jukemura J
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 21390457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey.
    Hardwicke TE; Goodman SN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239598. PubMed ID: 33002031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The importance of analysis in published evidence levels].
    Bernardo WM
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2011; 57(1):1. PubMed ID: 21390444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "There was no difference (p = 0.079)".
    Ranstam J
    Acta Orthop; 2021 Aug; 92(4):371-372. PubMed ID: 33888030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and meaninglessness.
    Bogduk N
    Pain Med; 2012 Feb; 13(2):148-9. PubMed ID: 22313497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does bad inference drive out good?
    Marozzi M
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 25974387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society.
    Curran-Everett D; Benos DJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2004 Dec; 28(1-4):85-7. PubMed ID: 15319187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
    Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends.
    Altman DG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(23):3275-89. PubMed ID: 11113959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.
    O'Leary JD; Crawford MW
    Can J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 60(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 23760791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.
    Parsons NR; Hiskens R; Price CL; Achten J; Costa ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1154-9. PubMed ID: 21911523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.
    Yao XI; Wang X; Speicher PJ; Hwang ES; Cheng P; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Schrag D; Pang HH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 28376195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions.
    Kunath F; Grobe HR; Rücker G; Engehausen D; Antes G; Wullich B; Meerpohl JJ
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22104723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
    Evans RG; Su DF
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting sex as a biologic variable in research published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery Publications.
    Gloviczki P; Lawrence PF
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 69(1):4. PubMed ID: 30579456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.