274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3193817)
1. Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.
Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Brown ML; Morin RL; Riggs BL
Mayo Clin Proc; 1988 Nov; 63(11):1075-84. PubMed ID: 3193817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.
Holbrook TL; Barrett-Connor E; Klauber M; Sartoris D
Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Nov; 49(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 1782570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
Kelly TL; Slovik DM; Schoenfeld DA; Neer RM
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1988 Oct; 67(4):839-44. PubMed ID: 3417851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
Hansen MA; Hassager C; Overgaard K; Marslew U; Riis BJ; Christiansen C
J Nucl Med; 1990 Jul; 31(7):1156-62. PubMed ID: 2362194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement.
Sabatier JP; Guaydier-Souquieres G
Clin Rheumatol; 1989 Jun; 8 Suppl 2():41-5. PubMed ID: 2667870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of lumbar spine bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry.
Gotfredsen A; Pødenphant J; Nørgaard H; Nilas L; Nielsen VA; Christiansen C
J Nucl Med; 1988 Feb; 29(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 3346735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of patient's weight on dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mineral density.
Martin P; Verhas M; Als C; Geerts L; Paternot J; Bergmann P
Osteoporos Int; 1993 Jul; 3(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 8338975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instrument performance in bone density testing at five Australian centres.
Khan KM; Henzell SL; Broderick C; Prince RL; Saul A; Lomman J; Wark JD
Aust N Z J Med; 1997 Oct; 27(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 9404582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of vertebral mineral content by means of a single-crystal scintillation camera.
Vandevivere J; Dobbeleir A; Ham HR; Williame L
Nucl Med Commun; 1988 Aug; 9(8):603-12. PubMed ID: 3173918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry systems for spinal bone mineral measurement.
Lai KC; Goodsitt MM; Murano R; Chesnut CH
Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Mar; 50(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 1617493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some physical and clinical factors influencing the measurement of precision error, least significant change, and bone mineral density in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Frimeth J; Galiano E; Webster D
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 19932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [DEXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and DPA (dual photon absorptiometry) in densitometry of the femoral neck: correlation of the measurements of three commercially available instruments].
Hübsch P; Schneider B; Seidl G; Kalchhauser G; Klaushofer K; Popovic R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jul; 1(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 1911892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumbar computed tomography scans are not appropriate surrogates for bone mineral density scans in primary adult spinal deformity.
Kohan EM; Nemani VM; Hershman S; Kang DG; Kelly MP
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E4. PubMed ID: 29191096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anomalies in the measurement of changes in bone mineral density of the spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Tothill P; Avenell A
Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 Aug; 63(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 9685517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of total-body measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual-photon absorptiometry.
Nuti R; Martini G; Righi G; Frediani B; Turchetti V
J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Jul; 6(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 1950673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance Evaluation of Material Decomposition With Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT and Implications for Assessing Bone Mineral Density.
Wait JM; Cody D; Jones AK; Rong J; Baladandayuthapani V; Kappadath SC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1234-41. PubMed ID: 26001233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Larcos G; Wahner HW
J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
