BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3193885)

  • 1. Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type.
    Gollin ES; Sharps MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 3193885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's recall and organization of noncategorical associated pictures.
    Frankel MT
    Psychol Rep; 1983 Jun; 52(3):787-90. PubMed ID: 6878574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM.
    Eich JM
    Psychol Rev; 1985 Jan; 92(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 3983302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The structure of memory: evidence concerning the recall of surface and background color of shapes.
    Wilton RN
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):579-98. PubMed ID: 2798923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences in recall of categorized material: organization or retrieval?
    Morrison FJ; Lord C
    J Genet Psychol; 1982 Dec; 141(2d Half):233-41. PubMed ID: 7153773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical and spatial modes of representation in young children's recall.
    Garrison A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Dec; 30(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 7205135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces.
    Hanley JR; Cowell ES
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):545-55. PubMed ID: 3193886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infants' recognition memory, forgetting, and savings.
    Cornell EH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1979 Oct; 28(2):359-74. PubMed ID: 501283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of stimulus change: the hypothetical roles of visual transient responses.
    Stelmach LB; Bourassa CM; Di Lollo V
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 6728623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In eliciting hemisphere asymmetries which is more important: the stimulus input side or the recognition side? A tachistoscopic study on normals.
    Berrini R; Della Sala S; Spinnler H; Sterzi R; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 7070656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Iconic memory for elementary visual characteristics: on a poorly accessible visual store and the long-lasting icon].
    Schulz T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7347590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concept learning, memory and transfer of dot pattern categories.
    Vandierendonck A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1984 Feb; 55(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 6711353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of conditioned stimuli on learning and recognition].
    Grabitz HJ; Wittmann B; Hammerl M
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 3579547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of orienting activity on memory for pictures and words in children and adults.
    Emmerich HJ; Ackerman BP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1979 Dec; 28(3):499-515. PubMed ID: 533840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition memory for objects in very young children: the effect of shape and label similarity on preference for novel stimuli.
    Daehler MW; O'Connor MP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Apr; 29(2):306-21. PubMed ID: 7365428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective visual attention in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's patients: memory- and data-driven control.
    Cossa FM; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(6):887-92. PubMed ID: 2755597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organization revealed by recall orders and confirmed by pauses.
    Reitman JS; Rueter HH
    Cogn Psychol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):554-81. PubMed ID: 7418369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Klatzky RL; Forrest FH
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Jan; 12(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 6708811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.