These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31938897)

  • 21. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep.
    Lahens B; Neiva R; Tovar N; Alifarag AM; Jimbo R; Bonfante EA; Bowers MM; Cuppini M; Freitas H; Witek L; Coelho PG
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():56-65. PubMed ID: 27341291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simplified drilling technique does not decrease dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report.
    Jimbo R; Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Suzuki M; Tovar N; Lilin T; Janal M; Coelho PG
    J Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 84(11):1599-605. PubMed ID: 23215672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part II: a pilot study in dogs.
    Negri B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Maté Sánchez-de Val J; Guardia J; Muñoz-Guzón F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):236-244. PubMed ID: 22092544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bone regeneration around implants in the canine mandible with cultured fibroblasts in polyglactin mesh.
    Sparks MS; Kerns DG; Wilson TG; Hallmon WW; Spears R; Haghighat N
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jul; 78(7):1276-87. PubMed ID: 17608583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone-implant interface around titanium implants under different loading conditions: a histomorphometrical analysis in the Macaca fascicularis monkey.
    Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Wicht H; Yacoob H; Nentwig GH
    J Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 74(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 14653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vivo osseointegration of dental implants with an antimicrobial peptide coating.
    Chen X; Zhou XC; Liu S; Wu RF; Aparicio C; Wu JY
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 May; 28(5):76. PubMed ID: 28386851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Osseoinductive elements for promoting osseointegration around immediate implants: a pilot study in the foxhound dog.
    Salomó-Coll O; Maté-Sánchez de Val JE; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Satorres-Nieto M; Gargallo-Albiol J; Calvo-Guirado JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):e167-e175. PubMed ID: 25833366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Osseointegration in periodontitis susceptible individuals.
    Cecchinato D; Bressan EA; Toia M; Araújo MG; Liljenberg B; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 22092689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The influence of chemically-modified SLA on bone defect healing around implants in dogs].
    Lv XF; Zhuang LF; Liu X; Zhang ZY; Lai HC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Jun; 19(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 20635045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of 50 to 60°C heating on osseointegration of dental implants in dense bone: an in vivo histological study.
    Trisi P; Berardini M; Falco A; Vulpiani MP; Masciotra L
    Implant Dent; 2014 Oct; 23(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 25238268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of bone condensation and crestal preparation on the bone response to implants designed for immediate loading: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
    de Oliveira RR; Novaes AB; Taba M; de Souza SL; Papalexiou V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 17340898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
    Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses of the osseointegration of microscrews with different surgical techniques in beagle dogs.
    Wu X; Deng F; Wang Z; Zhao Z; Wang J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 18656397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in the maxillae of minipigs. Part II: histomorphometric analysis.
    Nkenke E; Fenner M; Vairaktaris EG; Neukam FW; Radespiel-Tröger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 16161738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bone formation around immediately loaded and submerged dental implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface after 4 and 8 weeks: a human histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
    Degidi M; Piattelli A; Shibli JA; Perrotti V; Iezzi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 19865630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types.
    Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.
    Gehrke SA; Aramburú J; Pérez-Díaz L; do Prado TD; Dedavid BA; Mazon P; N De Aza P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233304. PubMed ID: 32407416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparisons between Bio-Oss(®) and Straumann(®) Bone Ceramic in immediate and staged implant placement in dogs mandible bone defects.
    Antunes AA; Oliveira Neto P; de Santis E; Caneva M; Botticelli D; Salata LA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 22168758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.