These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31939371)

  • 1. Cutting efficiency of different diamond burs after repeated cuts and sterilization cycles in autoclave.
    Gonzaga CC; Falcão Spina DR; de Paiva Bertoli FM; Feres RL; Franco Fernandes AB; da Cunha LF
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):915-919. PubMed ID: 31939371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cutting effectiveness of diamond instruments subjected to cyclic sterilization methods.
    Gureckis KM; Burgess JO; Schwartz RS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 1666657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of cutting rates among single-patient-use and multiple-patient-use diamond burs.
    Pilcher ES; Tietge JD; Draughn RA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 9(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11070132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the cutting efficiency of different types of dental diamond rotary instrument with repeated cuts and disinfection.
    Bae JH; Yi J; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 24231434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cutting efficiency of three diamond bur grit sizes.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Dec; 131(12):1706-10. PubMed ID: 11143734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Autoclaving on Diamond Burs Fabricated via Different Methods.
    Yu Y; Zhan Q; Yang T; Teng W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(4):451–457. PubMed ID: 32589003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs.
    Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Greene TD; Moss ME; Lee HJ; Ben-Hanan U; Graser GN; Barzilay I
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15032891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bur Choice When Removing Zirconia Restorations.
    Keeling FL; Taft RM; Haney SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):347-352. PubMed ID: 35771711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Diamond Bur Grit Size on Composite Repair.
    Valente LL; Silva MF; Fonseca AS; Münchow EA; Isolan CP; Moraes RR
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Jun; 17(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 26114162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Mar; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10356549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of the cutting efficiency and working life of carbide burs.
    Di Cristofaro RG; Giner L; Mayoral JR
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 23387508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of sectioning rates among carbide and diamond burs using three casting alloys.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Dec; 8(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 10895675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs.
    Ermis RB; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Coutinho E; Van Landuyt KL; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):978-85. PubMed ID: 18199476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of cutting efficiency with different diamond burs and water flow rates in cutting lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
    Siegel SC; Patel T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Oct; 147(10):792-6. PubMed ID: 27346462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced dental cutting through chemomechanical effects.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Siegel SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 131(10):1465-9. PubMed ID: 11042986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cutting effectiveness of carbide burs following multiple steam autoclaving cycles.
    Spranley TJ; Cheramie TJ; Ireland EJ; Sergent RS; Yeadon WR; Desonier DP; Raymond WD; Hagen JL
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 21613040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds.
    Roeder LB; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15151337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.