These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31939891)
1. The Diagnostic Accuracy of PET(CT) in Patients With Neuroblastoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Li HF; Mao HJ; Zhao L; Guo DL; Chen B; Yang JF J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 31939891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Wei MZ; Zhao ZH; Wang JY J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 31939890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Performance of Sun L; Zhang B; Peng R Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():8125373. PubMed ID: 34220381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of diagnosing and staging accuracy of PET (CT) and MIBG on patients with neuroblastoma: Systemic review and meta-analysis. Xia J; Zhang H; Hu Q; Liu SY; Zhang LQ; Zhang A; Zhang XL; Wang YQ; Liu AG J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 37(5):649-660. PubMed ID: 29058276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of choline PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Guo Y; Wang L; Hu J; Feng D; Xu L PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203400. PubMed ID: 30192819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Kim SJ; Lee SW; Ha HK Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30269140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis. Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Local Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 26 Individual Studies. Yu T; Meng N; Chi D; Zhao Y; Wang K; Luo Y Cell Biochem Biophys; 2015 Jun; 72(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 25737131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate for lymph node staging in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim SJ; Koo PJ; Pak K; Kim IJ; Kim K World J Urol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):331-340. PubMed ID: 29294164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis. Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Son GM; Kim SJ Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):456-463. PubMed ID: 30132094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Bollineni VR; Ytre-Hauge S; Bollineni-Balabay O; Salvesen HB; Haldorsen IS J Nucl Med; 2016 Jun; 57(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 26823564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic and grading accuracy of Xiao J; Jin Y; Nie J; Chen F; Ma X BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):767. PubMed ID: 31382920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim SJ; Lee SW J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):576-582. PubMed ID: 28994187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT versus single time point 18FDG-PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis. Zhang L; Wang Y; Lei J; Tian J; Zhai Y Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):770-7. PubMed ID: 23528566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of positron emission tomography computed tomography in predicting invasiveness of ground glass nodules: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Xiao J; Li M; Du Q; Han H; Ge Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Oct; 100(41):e27507. PubMed ID: 34731135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET in patients with testicular cancer: a meta-analysis. Zhao JY; Ma XL; Li YY; Zhang BL; Li MM; Ma XL; Liu L Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3525-31. PubMed ID: 24870751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]