These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31940258)

  • 1. Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.
    Souza P; Gallun F; Wright R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):334-344. PubMed ID: 31940258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.
    Souza P; Wright R; Gallun F; Reinhart P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 61(8):2126-2137. PubMed ID: 30073277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?
    Souza PE; Ellis G; Marks K; Wright R; Gallun F
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jun; 64(6):2053-2069. PubMed ID: 34019777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Souza PE; Wright RA; Blackburn MC; Tatman R; Gallun FJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):520-34. PubMed ID: 25629388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
    Hedrick M; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wang S; Xu L; Mannell R
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 12(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 21833816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.
    Varnet L; Langlet C; Lorenzi C; Lazard DS; Micheyl C
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519886707. PubMed ID: 31722636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Venezia JH; Martin AG; Hickok G; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1051-1067. PubMed ID: 30986140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.