These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31940266)

  • 1. Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review.
    Crotty S; Blish C; Cadwell K; Chi H; Goldrath A; Green D; Kaech SM; Krummel M; Pepper M; Rothlin CV; Wherry EJ;
    Immunity; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 31940266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Idol and NIH Grant Review.
    Pagano M
    Cell; 2006 Aug; 126(4):637-8. PubMed ID: 16923379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux.
    Munger K
    Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH plans one grant for all sizes.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5340):1006. PubMed ID: 9381196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
    Nairn RS; Sweasy JB
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jan; 6(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17157082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes to NIH grant system may backfire.
    Karp PD; Sherlock G; Gerlt JA; Sim I; Paulsen I; Babbitt PC; Laderoute K; Hunter L; Sternberg P; Wooley J; Bourne PE
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5905):1187-8. PubMed ID: 19023064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking grant peer review.
    Fliesler SJ
    Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5305):1399. PubMed ID: 9072799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?
    Wessely S
    Lancet; 1998 Jul; 352(9124):301-5. PubMed ID: 9690424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review of grant applications.
    Swift M
    Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9133):1063-4. PubMed ID: 9759775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review of grant applications.
    Sekikawa A; Aaron DJ; Acosta B; Nishimura R; LaPorte RE
    Lancet; 1998 Sep; 352(9133):1064. PubMed ID: 9759777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIH pilots faster feedback for grant resubmissions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Oct; 389(6654):898. PubMed ID: 9353109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH grants. Peer review reforms get good review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Jul; 265(5171):467. PubMed ID: 8036487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH tunes up peer review.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5151):1212-3. PubMed ID: 8122098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure and process of federal funding for AD research.
    Wells N; Hurley AC
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 1():S117-9. PubMed ID: 10369531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.