305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31940382)
1. Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling.
Jian C; Luukkonen P; Yki-Järvinen H; Salonen A; Korpela K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227285. PubMed ID: 31940382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as complementary methods for the investigation of the cheese microbiota.
Dreier M; Meola M; Berthoud H; Shani N; Wechsler D; Junier P
BMC Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35130830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards Quantitative Microbiome Community Profiling Using Internal Standards.
Lin Y; Gifford S; Ducklow H; Schofield O; Cassar N
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 85(5):. PubMed ID: 30552195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PCR-based quantification of taxa-specific abundances in microbial communities: Quantifying and avoiding common pitfalls.
Bonk F; Popp D; Harms H; Centler F
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Oct; 153():139-147. PubMed ID: 30267718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pancreatic cyst fluid harbors a unique microbiome.
Li S; Fuhler GM; Bn N; Jose T; Bruno MJ; Peppelenbosch MP; Konstantinov SR
Microbiome; 2017 Nov; 5(1):147. PubMed ID: 29122007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next-Generation Sequencing Library Preparation for 16S rRNA Microbiome Analysis After Serpin Treatment.
Maldonado J; Yaron JR; Zhang L; Lucas A
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1826():213-221. PubMed ID: 30194603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of the unknown components of the oral microflora of teeth with periapical radiolucencies in a Turkish population using next-generation sequencing techniques.
İriboz E; Arıcan Öztürk B; Kolukırık M; Karacan I; Sazak Öveçoğlu H
Int Endod J; 2018 Dec; 51(12):1349-1357. PubMed ID: 29855054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances.
Props R; Kerckhof FM; Rubbens P; De Vrieze J; Hernandez Sanabria E; Waegeman W; Monsieurs P; Hammes F; Boon N
ISME J; 2017 Feb; 11(2):584-587. PubMed ID: 27612291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of a culture-free microbiota profiling platform (MYcrobiota) for clinical diagnostics.
Boers SA; Hiltemann SD; Stubbs AP; Jansen R; Hays JP
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 29549470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A real-time PCR assay for accurate quantification of the individual members of the Altered Schaedler Flora microbiota in gnotobiotic mice.
Gomes-Neto JC; Mantz S; Held K; Sinha R; Segura Munoz RR; Schmaltz R; Benson AK; Walter J; Ramer-Tait AE
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Apr; 135():52-62. PubMed ID: 28189782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbiota Analysis Using Sequencing by Synthesis: From Library Preparation to Sequencing.
Nelson A; Stewart CJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2121():165-184. PubMed ID: 32147795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of method bias for determining bacterial populations in bacterial community analyses.
Takahashi M; Kita Y; Mizuno A; Goto-Yamamoto N
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Oct; 124(4):476-486. PubMed ID: 28601609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges.
Tsilimigras MC; Fodor AA
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 27255738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a genus-specific next generation sequencing approach for sensitive and quantitative determination of the Legionella microbiome in freshwater systems.
Pereira RP; Peplies J; Brettar I; Höfle MG
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):79. PubMed ID: 28359254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.
Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA
BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
