BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31941966)

  • 1. A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
    Liu X; Wang W; Hu K; Zhang F; Hou X; Yan J; Meng Q; Zhou Z; Miao Z; Guan H; Ma J; Shen J; Zhen H; Wang W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):362. PubMed ID: 31941966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of tumor size and number of positive nodes in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1 cervical cancer.
    Maeda M; Mabuchi S; Sakata M; Deguchi S; Kakubari R; Matsuzaki S; Hisa T; Kamiura S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2024 Feb; 54(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 37935434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prophylactic Extended-Field Irradiation Versus Pelvic Irradiation in Patients With Cervical Cancer With 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC1 Disease.
    Wang W; Meng Q; Zhou Y; Hu K; Zhang F; Qiu J; Hou X; Lian X; Yan J; Liu Z; Sun S; Ma J; Liu X
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2023; 13(5):e409-e415. PubMed ID: 37075837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.
    Zhang W; Yu H; Xiu Y; Meng F; Wang Z; Zhao K; Wang Y; Chen Z; Liu J; Chen J; Sun B
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338241254075. PubMed ID: 38720626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
    Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.
    Matsuo K; Machida H; Mandelbaum RS; Konishi I; Mikami M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 30389105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The variable impact of positive lymph nodes in cervical cancer: Implications of the new FIGO staging system.
    McComas KN; Torgeson AM; Ager BJ; Hellekson C; Burt LM; Maurer KA; Werner TL; Gaffney DK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 156(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 31744640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
    Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Prognosis and Risk Stratification Based on Pelvic Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
    Li X; Wei LC; Zhang Y; Zhao LN; Li WW; Ping LJ; Dang YZ; Hu J; Shi M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 27400321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
    Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.
    Qin F; Pang H; Yu T; Luo Y; Dong Y
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221086403. PubMed ID: 35341413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
    Meng Q; Wang W; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang F
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():870670. PubMed ID: 35646645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative platelet count improves the prognostic prediction of the FIGO staging system for operable cervical cancer patients.
    Zheng RR; Huang XX; Jin C; Zhuang XX; Ye LC; Zheng FY; Lin F
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Oct; 473():198-203. PubMed ID: 27836106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Kagabu M; Nagasawa T; Tatsuki S; Fukagawa Y; Tomabechi H; Takatori E; Kaido Y; Shoji T; Baba T
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(6):. PubMed ID: 34072478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes.
    Wang R; Tao X; Wu X; Jiang H; Xia H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):946-952. PubMed ID: 31394263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significance of para-aortic lymph node evaluation in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer.
    Cho WK; Kim YJ; Kim H; Kim YS; Park W
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Sep; 50(10):1150-1156. PubMed ID: 32577748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic extended field irradiation in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO classification.
    Meng Q; Liu X; Wang W; Hou X; Lian X; Sun S; Yan J; Liu Z; Miao Z; Hu K; Zhang F
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):228. PubMed ID: 31842919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer: efficacy, toxicity and prognosis.
    Meng Q; Liu X; Hu K; Hou X; Zhang F; Wang W; Yan J; Yang B; Li W
    J Cancer; 2023; 14(6):1001-1010. PubMed ID: 37151392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.