BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31944127)

  • 1. Development and validation of the audio processor satisfaction questionnaire (APSQ) for hearing implant users.
    Billinger-Finke M; Bräcker T; Weber A; Amann E; Anderson I; Batsoulis C
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):392-397. PubMed ID: 31944127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the English version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ).
    Felder J; Amann E; Anderson I; Stohl J; Billinger-Finke M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273390. PubMed ID: 36048757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the Arabic language version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) for hearing implant users.
    Alasmi A; Saleh S; Anderson I; Abdelsamad Y; Hagr A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303301. PubMed ID: 38857266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception and hearing effort using a new active middle ear implant audio processor.
    Rahne T; Fröhlich L; Wagner L; Kropp MH; Müller A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 279(10):4667-4675. PubMed ID: 34874465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.
    Dazert S; Thomas JP; Büchner A; Müller J; Hempel JM; Löwenheim H; Mlynski R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27909888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a self-report tool to evaluate hearing aid outcomes among Chinese speakers.
    Wong LL; Hang N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1548-63. PubMed ID: 24686556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing-aid outcomes in Chinese adults: clinical application and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire.
    Kam AC
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 22537034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Chinese version "satisfaction with amplification in daily life (SADL)" survey for hearing-aid users.
    Fang TY; Chang HJ; Wan TK; Wang PC; Chen YH
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 23514602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New technology can benefit established middle ear implant users: Samba 2 vs previous models of audio processors for Vibrant Soundbridge.
    Ratuszniak A; Lorens A; Obrycka A; Witkowska J; Skarzynski H; Skarzynski PH
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 May; 280(5):2387-2396. PubMed ID: 36441245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. German version].
    Lailach S; Lenz A; Zahnert T; Neudert M
    HNO; 2023 Sep; 71(9):583-591. PubMed ID: 37540233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone-anchored hearing aids are effective and associated with a high degree of satisfaction.
    Gardell IS; Andresen K; Faber CE; Wanscher JH
    Dan Med J; 2015 Jul; 62(7):. PubMed ID: 26183047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new audio processor for combined electric and acoustic stimulation for the treatment of partial deafness.
    Lorens A; Zgoda M; Skarzynski H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 132(7):739-50. PubMed ID: 22668312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
    Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear Implant Single-Unit Audio Processors in Young Children.
    Saleh S; Almuhawas F; Alradhi A; Alhabib SF; Alzhrani F; Hagr A
    J Int Adv Otol; 2023 Nov; 19(6):447-453. PubMed ID: 38088315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-reported long-term benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device.
    Hundertpfund J; Meyer JE; Óvári A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241247. PubMed ID: 33137128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Single Sided Deafness on the New Non-Invasive Adhesive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
    Mertens G; Gilles A; Bouzegta R; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):940-949. PubMed ID: 30020266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.