144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31944127)
21. Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Blanco JL; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517730526. PubMed ID: 28929903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Audiological Results with the SAMBA Audio Processor in Comparison to the Amadé for the Vibrant Soundbridge.
Zimmermann D; Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2020; 25(3):164-172. PubMed ID: 32097930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.
Cienkowski KM; McHugh MS; McHugo GJ; Musiek FE; Cox RM; Baird JC
Int J Audiol; 2006 Jul; 45(7):393-9. PubMed ID: 16938797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assistive hearing technologies among students with hearing impairment: factors that promote satisfaction.
Rekkedal AM
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(4):499-517. PubMed ID: 22960754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [User benefit of modern hearing aids. A comparative study].
Kießling J; Kreikemeier S
HNO; 2013 Aug; 61(8):662-9. PubMed ID: 23744085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.
Korkmaz MH; Bayır Ö; Er S; Işık E; Saylam G; Tatar EÇ; Özdek A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3723-3732. PubMed ID: 27094053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. International outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): results from the Chinese version.
Liu H; Zhang H; Liu S; Chen X; Han D; Zhang L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):673-8. PubMed ID: 21916818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living Questionnaire in Hearing Aid Users.
Genç M; Çildir B; Kaya M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):898-908. PubMed ID: 30479262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.
McRackan TR; Hand BN; Velozo CA; Dubno JR;
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 30531259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Hearing Impairment Impact-Significant Other Profile (HII-SOP): a tool to measure hearing loss-related quality of life in spouses of people with hearing loss.
Preminger JE; Meeks S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):807-23. PubMed ID: 23169197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Focusing on positive listening experiences improves hearing aid outcomes in experienced hearing aid users.
Lelic D; Parker D; Herrlin P; Wolters F; Smeds K
Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):420-430. PubMed ID: 37005863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hearing aid and cochlear implant use in children with hearing loss at three years of age: Predictors of use and predictors of changes in use.
Marnane V; Ching TY
Int J Audiol; 2015 Aug; 54(8):544-51. PubMed ID: 25816866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.
Heffernan E; Maidment DW; Barry JG; Ferguson MA
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 29905669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Style preference survey: a report on the psychometric properties and a cross-validation experiment.
Smith SL; Ricketts T; McArdle RA; Chisolm TH; Alexander G; Bratt G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):89-104. PubMed ID: 23357803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Provision, perception and use of trainable hearing aids in Australia: a survey of clinicians and hearing impaired adults.
Walravens E; Keidser G; Hickson L
Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):787-795. PubMed ID: 27598724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
