These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31944811)

  • 1. Choice protection for feeling-focused decisions.
    Maglio SJ; Reich T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1704-1718. PubMed ID: 31944811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feeling certain: Gut choice, the true self, and attitude certainty.
    Maglio SJ; Reich T
    Emotion; 2019 Aug; 19(5):876-888. PubMed ID: 30198736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does the emotional experience evolve? Feeling generation as evidence accumulation.
    Givon E; Itzhak-Raz A; Karmon-Presser A; Danieli G; Meiran N
    Emotion; 2020 Mar; 20(2):271-285. PubMed ID: 30843705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Models of Affective Decision Making: How Do Feelings Predict Choice?
    Charpentier CJ; De Neve JE; Li X; Roiser JP; Sharot T
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Jun; 27(6):763-75. PubMed ID: 27071751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotion-focused decision making.
    Mikels JA; Maglio SJ; Reed AE; Kaplowitz LJ
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):743-53. PubMed ID: 21639628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task conflict biases decision making.
    Schuch S; Dignath D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 May; 150(5):864-872. PubMed ID: 33001685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeated causal decision making.
    Hagmayer Y; Meder B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):33-50. PubMed ID: 22686840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.
    Lee D; Daunizeau J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231081. PubMed ID: 32421699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spoiling the pleasure of success: Emotional reactions to the experience of self-control conflict in the eating domain.
    Becker D; Jostmann NB; Hofmann W; Holland RW
    Emotion; 2019 Dec; 19(8):1377-1395. PubMed ID: 30335405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evil of banality: When choosing between the mundane feels like choosing between the worst.
    Shenhav A; Dean Wolf CK; Karmarkar UR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1892-1904. PubMed ID: 29771566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bending time: The role of affective appraisal in time perception.
    Uusberg A; Naar R; Tamm M; Kreegipuu K; Gross JJ
    Emotion; 2018 Dec; 18(8):1174-1188. PubMed ID: 29504799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions.
    Jaffé ME; Reutner L; Greifeneder R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220736. PubMed ID: 31412059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of memory in counterfactual valuation.
    Biderman N; Gershman SJ; Shohamy D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1754-1767. PubMed ID: 37199971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.
    FeldmanHall O; Glimcher P; Baker AL; Phelps EA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27690508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.
    Voigt K; Murawski C; Speer S; Bode S
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 30530856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient inertia and the status quo bias: when an inferior option is preferred.
    Suri G; Sheppes G; Schwartz C; Gross JJ
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1763-9. PubMed ID: 23873580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does deciding among morally relevant options feel like making a choice? How morality constrains people's sense of choice.
    Kouchaki M; Smith IH; Savani K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):788-804. PubMed ID: 30047759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discounting the freedom to choose: implications for the paradox of choice.
    Reed DD; Kaplan BA; Brewer AT
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):424-7. PubMed ID: 22503945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biasing nature of the tip-of-the-tongue experience: When decisions bask in the glow of the tip-of-the-tongue state.
    Cleary AM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jul; 148(7):1178-1191. PubMed ID: 30489121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.