These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31944820)

  • 41. The vibrant soundbridge: design and development.
    Ball GR
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 69():1-13. PubMed ID: 20610908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A multicenter study of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant: early clinical results and experience.
    Fraysse B; Lavieille JP; Schmerber S; Enée V; Truy E; Vincent C; Vaneecloo FM; Sterkers O
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Nov; 22(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 11698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Direct Drive Simulation - Sound-Simulation of the Vibrant Soundbridge®].
    Kaulitz S; Großmann W; Steinbach J; Hackenberg S; Kraus F; Köhler C; Mlynski R; Radeloff A; Rak K; Schraven SP; Hagen R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 May; 95(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 26669579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Middle ear implant in conductive and mixed congenital hearing loss in children.
    Roman S; Denoyelle F; Farinetti A; Garabedian EN; Triglia JM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 76(12):1775-8. PubMed ID: 22985678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant in mixed hearing loss. Indications, techniques, results.
    Dumon T; Gratacap B; Firmin F; Vincent R; Pialoux R; Casse B; Firmin B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 19813468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.
    Kwak SH; Moon YM; Nam GS; Bae SH; Kim SH; Jung J; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E926-E932. PubMed ID: 31977072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Lassaletta L; Calvino M; Sánchez-Cuadrado I; Pérez-Mora RM; Muñoz E; Gavilán J
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 25839978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Benefit of the Vibrant Soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bouccara D; Labassi S; Bebear JP; Bordure P; Dubreuil C; Dumon T; Frachet B; Fraysse B; Lavieille JP; Magnan J; Martin C; Meyer B; Mondain M; Portmann D; Robier A; Schmerber S; Thomassin JM; Truy E; Uziel A; Vanecloo FM; Vincent C; Ferrary E
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 18595192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [IMPLANTATION OF A VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE IN A WOMAN WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS AND RECURRENT OTITIS EXTERNA: A CASE STUDY].
    Betito HR; Dahan T; Halperin D; Katzenell U
    Harefuah; 2021 Mar; 160(3):155-160. PubMed ID: 33749177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Vibrant Soundbridge rehabilitation of conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Lüers JC; Hüttenbrink KB
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2014 Dec; 47(6):915-26. PubMed ID: 25282039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Audiologic limitations of Vibrant Soundbridge device: Is the contralateral hearing aid fitting indispensable?
    Jung J; Roh KJ; Moon IS; Kim SH; Hwang KR; Lee JM; Hou JH; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Sep; 126(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 26774568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA; Polanski JF; Schlegel C; Linder T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Active Middle Ear Implantation: Long-term Medical and Technical Follow-up, Implant Survival, and Complications.
    Zwartenkot JW; Mulder JJ; Snik AF; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun; 37(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 27023016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A new semi-implantable middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss: three-years follow-up in a pilot patient's group.
    Barbara M; Volpini L; Filippi C; Atturo F; Monini S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 138(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 28854835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of two different titanium couplers for an active middle ear implant.
    Schwab B; Salcher R; Teschner M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):1615-20. PubMed ID: 25203563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A surgical technique for implantation of the vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant in dogs.
    Ter Haar G; Mulder JJ; Venker-van Haagen AJ; van Sluijs FJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Vet Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 21361989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Rotational tomography of the normal and reconstructed middle ear in temporal bones: an experimental study.
    Offergeld Ch; Kromeier J; Aschendorff A; Maier W; Klenzner T; Beleites T; Zahnert T; Schipper J; Laszig R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 264(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 17047976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.
    Wagner JH; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 21844783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.