These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31944965)

  • 1. Relationship Between Spatial Variations in Static Skin Deformation and Perceived Roughness of Macroscopic Surfaces.
    Okamoto S; Oishi A
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 31944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple Spatial Spectral Components of Static Skin Deformation for Predicting Macroscopic Roughness Perception.
    Sun Q; Okamoto S; Akiyama Y; Yamada Y
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2022; 15(3):646-654. PubMed ID: 35969577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roughness perception in tactile channels: evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):120-32. PubMed ID: 23952287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.
    Blake DT; Hsiao SS; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1997 Oct; 17(19):7480-9. PubMed ID: 9295394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The physical basis of perceived roughness in virtual sinusoidal textures.
    Unger B; Klatzky R; Hollis R
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(4):496-505. PubMed ID: 24808401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.
    Yoshioka T; Gibb B; Dorsch AK; Hsiao SS; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 2001 Sep; 21(17):6905-16. PubMed ID: 11517278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.
    Connor CE; Hsiao SS; Phillips JR; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 10(12):3823-36. PubMed ID: 2269886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness.
    Verrillo RT; Bolanowski SJ; McGlone FP
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1999; 16(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 10632031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.
    Smith AM; Chapman CE; Deslandes M; Langlais JS; Thibodeau MP
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 12012159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the relative roles of slowly and rapidly adapting afferent fibers in roughness perception.
    Johnson KO; Hsiao SS
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1994 May; 72(5):488-97. PubMed ID: 7954078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roughness perception across the hands.
    Roberts RD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1306-17. PubMed ID: 23653412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception.
    Connor CE; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1992 Sep; 12(9):3414-26. PubMed ID: 1527586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Roughness based perceptual analysis towards digital skin imaging system with haptic feedback.
    Kim K
    Skin Res Technol; 2016 Aug; 22(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26450343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.
    Natsume M; Tanaka Y; Kappers AML
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211407. PubMed ID: 30699197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces.
    Sahli R; Prot A; Wang A; Müser MH; Piovarči M; Didyk P; Bennewitz R
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15800. PubMed ID: 32978470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roughness of simulated surfaces examined with a haptic tool: effects of spatial period, friction, and resistance amplitude.
    Smith AM; Basile G; Theriault-Groom J; Fortier-Poisson P; Campion G; Hayward V
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 20012535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.
    Cascio CJ; Sathian K
    J Neurosci; 2001 Jul; 21(14):5289-96. PubMed ID: 11438604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tactile roughness discrimination of the finger pad relies primarily on vibration sensitive afferents not necessarily located in the hand.
    Libouton X; Barbier O; Berger Y; Plaghki L; Thonnard JL
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 229(1):273-9. PubMed ID: 22265887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception.
    Johnson KO; Hsiao SS
    Annu Rev Neurosci; 1992; 15():227-50. PubMed ID: 1575442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch.
    Meftah el-M ; Belingard L; Chapman CE
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 132(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 10883383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.