298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31945191)
1. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of monte carlo to support commissioning of the treatment planning system of new pencil beam scanning proton therapy facilities.
Botnariuc D; Court S; Lourenço A; Gosling A; Royle G; Hussein M; Rompokos V; Veiga C
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38052092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nuclear halo measurements for accurate prediction of field size factor in a Varian ProBeam proton PBS system.
Harms J; Chang CW; Zhang R; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31793202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy.
Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.
Rahman M; Bruza P; Lin Y; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Zhang R
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6500-6508. PubMed ID: 33030241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.
Aitkenhead AH; Sitch P; Richardson JC; Winterhalter C; Patel I; Mackay RI
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200228. PubMed ID: 32726141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PETRA: A pencil beam trimming algorithm for analytical proton therapy dose calculations with the dynamic collimation system.
Bennett LC; Hyer DE; Erhart K; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Smith BR; Hill PM; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7263-7280. PubMed ID: 37370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.
Asadi A; Akhavanallaf A; Hosseini SA; Vosoughi N; Zaidi H
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 36424313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commissioning and validation of a novel commercial TPS for ocular proton therapy.
Wulff J; Koska B; Heufelder J; Janson M; Bäcker CM; Siregar H; Behrends C; Bäumer C; Foerster A; Bechrakis NE; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):365-379. PubMed ID: 36195575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
