These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31945325)

  • 1. Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process.
    Mark JA; Underberg K; Kramer RE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jun; 91(6):1328-1333. PubMed ID: 31945325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing duodenoscope reprocessing: rigorous assessment of a culture and quarantine protocol.
    Higa JT; Choe J; Tombs D; Gluck M; Ross AS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):223-229. PubMed ID: 29476846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duodenoscope reprocessing surveillance with adenosine triphosphate testing and terminal cultures: a clinical pilot study.
    Visrodia K; Hanada Y; Pennington KM; Tosh PK; Topazian MD; Petersen BT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jul; 86(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 28396277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.
    Sethi S; Huang RJ; Barakat MT; Banaei N; Friedland S; Banerjee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1180-1187.e1. PubMed ID: 27818222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-reprocessing high-level disinfection protocol does not eliminate positive cultures from the elevators of duodenoscopes.
    Rex DK; Sieber M; Lehman GA; Webb D; Schmitt B; Kressel AB; Bang JY; Easler J; McHenry L; El-Hajj I; Fogel E; Watkins J; Sherman S
    Endoscopy; 2018 Jun; 50(6):588-596. PubMed ID: 29237202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.
    Ross AS; Baliga C; Verma P; Duchin J; Gluck M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 26092616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of ethylene-oxide gas sterilisation to terminate multidrug-resistant bacterial outbreaks linked to duodenoscopes.
    Muscarella LF
    BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2019; 6(1):e000282. PubMed ID: 31423318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized Comparison of 3 High-Level Disinfection and Sterilization Procedures for Duodenoscopes.
    Snyder GM; Wright SB; Smithey A; Mizrahi M; Sheppard M; Hirsch EB; Chuttani R; Heroux R; Yassa DS; Olafsdottir LB; Davis RB; Anastasiou J; Bapat V; Bidari K; Pleskow DK; Leffler D; Lane B; Chen A; Gold HS; Bartley A; King AD; Sawhney MS
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Oct; 153(4):1018-1025. PubMed ID: 28711629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A newly designed duodenoscope with detachable distal cap significantly reduces organic residue contamination after reprocessing.
    Ridtitid W; Pakvisal P; Chatsuwan T; J Kerr S; Tiankanon K; Piyachaturawat P; Mekaroonkamol P; Kongkam P; Rerknimitr R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Sep; 52(9):754-760. PubMed ID: 32299115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double high-level disinfection versus liquid chemical sterilization for reprocessing of duodenoscopes used for ERCP: a prospective randomized study.
    Gromski MA; Sieber MS; Sherman S; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Apr; 93(4):927-931. PubMed ID: 32745532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial of single versus double high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes using standard automated reprocessing.
    Bartles RL; Leggett JE; Hove S; Kashork CD; Wang L; Oethinger M; Baxter L; Brandabur JJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):306-313.e2. PubMed ID: 29476847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independent root-cause analysis of contributing factors, including dismantling of 2 duodenoscopes, to investigate an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    Rauwers AW; Troelstra A; Fluit AC; Wissink C; Loeve AJ; Vleggaar FP; Bruno MJ; Vos MC; Bode LG; Monkelbaan JF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Nov; 90(5):793-804. PubMed ID: 31102643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of cleaning monitoring combined with channel purge storage on elimination of Escherichia coli and environmental bacteria from duodenoscopes.
    Singh H; Duerksen DR; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N; Nugent Z; Bernard KA; Alfa MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Aug; 88(2):292-302. PubMed ID: 29476844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, multicenter, clinical study of duodenoscope contamination after reprocessing.
    Okamoto N; Sczaniecka A; Hirano M; Benedict M; Baba S; Horino Y; Takenouchi M; Morizane Y; Yana I; Segan R; Pineau L; Alfa MJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 43(12):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 35300743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of standard high-level disinfection for echoendoscopes.
    Becq A; Snyder GM; Heroux R; Wright SB; Bharadwaj S; Cohen J; Gabr M; Berzin TM; Pleskow DK; Sawhney MS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 May; 89(5):984-989. PubMed ID: 30653938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a novel endoscope cleaning brush on duodenoscope contamination.
    van der Ploeg K; Haanappel CP; Voor In 't Holt AF; de Groot W; Bulkmans AJC; Erler NS; Mason-Slingerland BCGC; Vos MC; Bruno MJ; Severin JA
    Endoscopy; 2024 Mar; 56(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 37848074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surveillance of guideline practices for duodenoscope and linear echoendoscope reprocessing in a large healthcare system.
    Brandabur JJ; Leggett JE; Wang L; Bartles RL; Baxter L; Diaz GA; Grunkemeier GL; Hove S; Oethinger M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Sep; 84(3):392-399.e3. PubMed ID: 27032883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance characteristics and optimal cut-off value of triple adenylate nucleotides test versus adenosine triphosphate test as point-of-care testing for predicting inadequacy of duodenoscope reprocessing.
    Ridtitid W; Pakvisal P; Chatsuwan T; Kerr SJ; Piyachaturawat P; Luangsukrerk T; Kongkam P; Rerknimitr R
    J Hosp Infect; 2020 Oct; 106(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 32768608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective microbiologic evaluation of the forceps elevator in closed-channel duodenoscopes after reprocessing.
    Paula H; Tribl B; Presterl E; Diab-El Schahawi M
    Am J Infect Control; 2017 Feb; 45(2):121-125. PubMed ID: 28341284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improper positioning of the elevator lever of duodenoscopes may lead to sequestered bacteria that survive disinfection by automated endoscope reprocessors.
    Alfa MJ; Singh H; Duerksen DR; Schultz G; Reidy C; DeGagne P; Olson N
    Am J Infect Control; 2018 Jan; 46(1):73-75. PubMed ID: 28918989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.