BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31945480)

  • 1. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 1: Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders.
    Chevance A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():206-212.e1. PubMed ID: 31945480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 7: Response to comments on the paper 2-6 re "Improving the generalizability and credibility of Core Outcome Sets (COSs) by involving large international sample of participants".
    Chevance A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():232-234. PubMed ID: 32565218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys.
    Biggane AM; Brading L; Ravaud P; Young B; Williamson PR
    Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 29454368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol.
    Gagnier JJ; Page MJ; Huang H; Verhagen AP; Buchbinder R
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):336. PubMed ID: 28728574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology.
    Schmitt J; Apfelbacher C; Spuls PI; Thomas KS; Simpson EL; Furue M; Chalmers J; Williams HC
    J Invest Dermatol; 2015 Jan; 135(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25186228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Core Outcome Sets Relevant to Maternity Service Users: A Scoping Review.
    Slavin V; Creedy DK; Gamble J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2021 Mar; 66(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 33565682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardising the reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: protocol for the development of a core outcome set and accompanying outcome measurement instrument set (the GASTROS study).
    Alkhaffaf B; Glenny AM; Blazeby JM; Williamson P; Bruce IA
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):370. PubMed ID: 28793921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.
    Schlessinger DI; Iyengar S; Yanes AF; Chiren SG; Godinez-Puig V; Chen BR; Kurta AO; Schmitt J; Deckert S; Furlan KC; Poon E; Cartee TV; Maher IA; Alam M; Sobanko JF
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):321. PubMed ID: 28701207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement was needed in the standards of development for cancer core outcome sets.
    Gargon E; Williamson PR; Blazeby JM; Kirkham JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():36-44. PubMed ID: 31009657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review.
    Sabet TS; Anderson DB; Stubbs PW; Buchbinder R; Terwee CB; Chiarotto A; Gagnier J; Verhagen AP
    Syst Rev; 2022 Nov; 11(1):248. PubMed ID: 36403060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains.
    Kaiser U; Kopkow C; Deckert S; Neustadt K; Jacobi L; Cameron P; De Angelis V; Apfelbacher C; Arnold B; Birch J; Bjarnegård A; Christiansen S; C de C Williams A; Gossrau G; Heinks A; Hüppe M; Kiers H; Kleinert U; Martelletti P; McCracken L; de Meij N; Nagel B; Nijs J; Norda H; Singh JA; Spengler E; Terwee CB; Tugwell P; Vlaeyen JWS; Wandrey H; Neugebauer E; Sabatowski R; Schmitt J
    Pain; 2018 Apr; 159(4):673-683. PubMed ID: 29300277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A core outcome set for all types of cardiac surgery effectiveness trials: a study protocol for an international eDelphi survey to achieve consensus on what to measure and the subsequent selection of measurement instruments.
    Moza A; Benstoem C; Autschbach R; Stoppe C; Goetzenich A
    Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():545. PubMed ID: 26625730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Navigating the landscape of core outcome set development in dermatology.
    Prinsen CAC; Spuls PI; Kottner J; Thomas KS; Apfelbacher C; Chalmers JR; Deckert S; Furue M; Gerbens L; Kirkham J; Simpson EL; Alam M; Balzer K; Beeckman D; Eleftheriadou V; Ezzedine K; Horbach SER; Ingram JR; Layton AM; Weller K; Wild T; Wolkerstorfer A; Williams HC; Schmitt J
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 81(1):297-305. PubMed ID: 30878565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Core Outcome Set for GROwth restriction: deVeloping Endpoints (COSGROVE).
    Healy P; Gordijn S; Ganzevoort W; Beune I; Baschat A; Khalil A; Kenny L; Bloomfield F; Daly M; Papageorghiou A; Devane D
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):451. PubMed ID: 30134949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods used in the selection of instruments for outcomes included in core outcome sets have improved since the publication of the COSMIN/COMET guideline.
    Gorst SL; Prinsen CAC; Salcher-Konrad M; Matvienko-Sikar K; Williamson PR; Terwee CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():64-75. PubMed ID: 32470621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies on Obesity in Pregnant Patients (COSSOPP): a study protocol.
    Dadouch R; Faheim M; Juando-Prats C; Parsons J; D'Souza R;
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):655. PubMed ID: 30482249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Key Role of Patient Involvement in the Development of Core Outcome Sets in Prostate Cancer.
    Beyer K; MacLennan SJ; Moris L; Lardas M; Mastris K; Hooker G; Greene R; Briers E; Omar MI; Healey J; Tripathee S; Gandaglia G; Venderbos LDF; Smith EJ; Bjorkqvist J; Asiimwe A; Huber J; Roobol MJ; Zong J; Bjartell A; N'Dow J; Briganti A; MacLennan S; Van Hemelrijck M; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):943-946. PubMed ID: 34602368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development.
    Keeley T; Williamson P; Callery P; Jones LL; Mathers J; Jones J; Young B; Calvert M
    Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):230. PubMed ID: 27142835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Core outcomes in periodontal trials: study protocol for core outcome set development.
    Lamont TJ; Clarkson JE; Ricketts DNJ; Heasman PA; Ramsay CR
    Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):436. PubMed ID: 28931440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 6: Improving the generalizability, credibility and implementation of core outcome sets - the example of the Cochrane Skin-Core Outcome Set Initiative (CS-COUSIN).
    Schmitt J; Kottner J; Lange T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():229-231. PubMed ID: 32413389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.