These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31945736)

  • 21. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Aging on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
    Mussoi BS; Brown CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e804-e811. PubMed ID: 32501933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Test/Retest Variability of the eCAP Threshold in Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Biesheuvel JD; de Vos JJ; Boot MS; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1457-1466. PubMed ID: 30946135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of automated and traditional ECAP recording approaches in clinical practice.
    Estienne P; Scaglia A; Kontides A; Lauss K; Schwarz K; Arauz SL
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jul; 61(7):583-591. PubMed ID: 34187279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring temporal response properties of auditory nerve fibers in cochlear implant recipients.
    Tabibi S; Kegel A; Lai WK; Bruce IC; Dillier N
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():187-196. PubMed ID: 31325737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anodic Polarity Minimizes Facial Nerve Stimulation as a Side Effect of Cochlear Implantation.
    Konerding WS; Baumhoff P; Kral A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Feb; 24(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 36459250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Hey M; Müller-Deile J; Hessel H; Killian M
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():14-22. PubMed ID: 28947082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
    Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
    Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.
    Hughes ML
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 34988867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Effect of Interphase Gap on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Jeng FC; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):918-934. PubMed ID: 31688319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
    Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
    Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.