These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31946483)

  • 1. Towards the precise microstructural mapping. Testing new anisotropic phantoms with layered and capillary geometries
    Mazur W; Krzyzak AT; Raszewski Z
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2835-2839. PubMed ID: 31946483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anisotropic phantoms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Krzyzak A; Klodowski K; Raszewski Z
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():414-7. PubMed ID: 26736287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The design of anisotropic diffusion phantoms for the validation of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
    Fieremans E; De Deene Y; Delputte S; Ozdemir MS; Achten E; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5405-19. PubMed ID: 18765890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical analysis of phantom rotations in BSD-DTI.
    Krzyzak A; Borkowski K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():410-3. PubMed ID: 26736286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the accuracy of PGSE DTI experiments using the spatial distribution of b matrix.
    Krzyżak AT; Olejniczak Z
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 33(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 25460327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dedicated diffusion phantoms for the investigation of free water elimination and mapping: insights into the influence of T
    Farrher E; Grinberg F; Kuo LW; Cho KH; Buschbeck RP; Chen MJ; Chiang HH; Choi CH; Shah NJ
    NMR Biomed; 2020 Apr; 33(4):e4210. PubMed ID: 31926122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The b matrix calculation using the anisotropic phantoms for DWI and DTI experiments.
    Krzyzak AT; Klodowski K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():418-21. PubMed ID: 26736288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation and experimental verification of the diffusion in an anisotropic fiber phantom.
    Fieremans E; De Deene Y; Delputte S; Ozdemir MS; D'Asseler Y; Vlassenbroeck J; Deblaere K; Achten E; Lemahieu I
    J Magn Reson; 2008 Feb; 190(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 18023218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Innovative anisotropic phantoms for calibration of diffusion tensor imaging sequences.
    Kłodowski K; Krzyżak AT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26707852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the systematic errors caused by diffusion gradient inhomogeneity in DTI-computer simulations.
    Borkowski K; Krzyżak AT
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4130. PubMed ID: 31343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of anisotropic phantoms using wood and fiber materials for diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
    Suzuki M; Moriya S; Hata J; Tachibana A; Senoo A; Niitsu M
    MAGMA; 2019 Oct; 32(5):539-547. PubMed ID: 31144164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining MR elastography and diffusion tensor imaging for the assessment of anisotropic mechanical properties: a phantom study.
    Qin EC; Sinkus R; Geng G; Cheng S; Green M; Rae CD; Bilston LE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 22987805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of MR parameter changes on the quantification of diffusion anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion tensor imaging: evaluation using a diffusional anisotropic phantom.
    Kim SJ; Choi CG; Kim JK; Yun SC; Jahng GH; Jeong HK; Kim EJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 25741191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of novel gradient directions with DTI to synthesize data with complicated diffusion behavior.
    Yanasak NE; Allison JD; Hu TC; Zhao Q
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1875-85. PubMed ID: 19544807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A theoretical validation of the B-matrix spatial distribution approach to diffusion tensor imaging.
    Borkowski K; Kłodowski K; Figiel H; Krzyżak AT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():1-6. PubMed ID: 27742435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concerning the matching of magnetic susceptibility differences for the compensation of background gradients in anisotropic diffusion fibre phantoms.
    Farrher E; Lindemeyer J; Grinberg F; Oros-Peusquens AM; Shah NJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176192. PubMed ID: 28467458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel pore size-controlled, susceptibility matched, 3D-printed MRI phantoms.
    Witherspoon VJ; Komlosh ME; Benjamini D; Özarslan E; Lavrik N; Basser PJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 Jun; 91(6):2431-2442. PubMed ID: 38368618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the effects of dephasing due to local gradients in diffusion tensor imaging experiments: relevance for diffusion tensor imaging fiber phantoms.
    Laun FB; Huff S; Stieltjes B
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 May; 27(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 18977104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Berry DB; You S; Warner J; Frank LR; Chen S; Ward SR
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Sep; 23(17-18):980-988. PubMed ID: 28338417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acquisition parameters for diffusion tensor imaging to emphasize fractional anisotropy: phantom study.
    Oida T; Nagahara S; Kobayashi T
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2011; 10(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 21720114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.