These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31946745)

  • 1. Ultra-focal Magnetic Stimulation Using a µTMS coil: a Computational Study.
    Colella M; Laher RM; Press DZ; McIlduff CE; Rutkove SB; Pascual-Leone A; Apollonio F; Liberti M; Bonmassar G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3987-3990. PubMed ID: 31946745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of flex miniaturized coils for focal nerve magnetic stimulation.
    Colella M; Press DZ; Laher RM; McIlduff CE; Rutkove SB; Cassarà AM; Apollonio F; Pascual-Leone A; Liberti M; Bonmassar G
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1779-1792. PubMed ID: 36502488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic numerical assessment of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    D'Agostino S; Colella M; Liberti M; Falsaperla R; Apollonio F
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3416-3431. PubMed ID: 35196394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils.
    Roth Y; Amir A; Levkovitz Y; Zangen A
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 24(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17277575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Anatomical Model and Skin Conductivity on the Electric Field Induced in the Head by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Colella M; Paffi A; Fontana S; Rossano F; De Santis V; Apollonio F; Liberti M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2917-2920. PubMed ID: 31946501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.
    Roth BJ; Cohen LG; Hallett M; Friauf W; Basser PJ
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Aug; 13(8):734-41. PubMed ID: 2385260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum-energy coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation: application to focal stimulation.
    Koponen LM; Nieminen JO; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 25458713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporally Interfering TMS: Focal and Dynamic Stimulation Location.
    Sorkhabi MM; Wendt K; Denison T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3537-3543. PubMed ID: 33018767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electric field estimation of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation clinically used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in anatomical head models.
    Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Chiaramello E; Roth Y; Zangen A; Ravazzani P
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 May; 43():30-38. PubMed ID: 28236602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Tachas NJ; Samaras T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detailed 3D models of the induced electric field of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
    Salinas FS; Lancaster JL; Fox PT
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2879-92. PubMed ID: 17473357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EM fields comparison between planar vs. solenoidal μMS coil designs for nerve stimulation.
    Bonmassar G; Golestanirad L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():3576-3579. PubMed ID: 29060671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a special designed high intensity coil to a standard round coil-TMS-setting.
    Szelényi A; Wölfle J; Fischer I; Steiger HJ; Sabel M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Mar; 279():72-78. PubMed ID: 28104487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the different winding methods of coil on electromagnetic field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Yang S; Xu G; Wang L; Zhang X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4270-3. PubMed ID: 19163656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. H-coil: Induced electric field properties and input/output curves on healthy volunteers, comparison with a standard figure-of-eight coil.
    Fadini T; Matthäus L; Rothkegel H; Sommer M; Tergau F; Schweikard A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1174-82. PubMed ID: 19433366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A theoretical comparison of electric and magnetic stimulation of the brain.
    Saypol JM; Roth BJ; Cohen LG; Hallett M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 1928873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the electric fields of transcranial electric and magnetic perturbation.
    Sheltraw DJ; Inglis B; Labruna L; Ivry R
    J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33662947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation method for in situ electric field in standardized human brain for different transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
    Iwahashi M; Gomez-Tames J; Laakso I; Hirata A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2224-2238. PubMed ID: 28222046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.