These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31947073)

  • 1. Prosthetic Hip ROM from Multibody Software Simulation.
    Putame G; Pascoletti G; Franceschini G; Dichio G; Terzini M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5386-5389. PubMed ID: 31947073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner M; Craiovan B; Voellner F; Worlicek M; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 27106215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.
    Kummer FJ; Shah S; Iyer S; DiCesare PE
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jun; 14(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 10428235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment].
    Laffargue P; Pinoit Y; Tabutin J; Giraud F; Puget J; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2006 Jun; 92(4):316-25. PubMed ID: 16948458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of bony range of motion (B-ROM) boundary for total hip replacement planning.
    Palit A; King R; Pierrepont J; Williams MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jul; 222():106937. PubMed ID: 35752118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
    Woerner M; Weber M; Sendtner E; Springorum R; Worlicek M; Craiovan B; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Int Orthop; 2017 Feb; 41(2):277-282. PubMed ID: 27150487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers.
    Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
    Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Akiyama K; Shibuya T
    Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 29275431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis.
    Vigdorchik JM; Sharma AK; Madurawe CS; Elbuluk AM; Baré JV; Pierrepont JW
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2501-2506. PubMed ID: 32507449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A three-dimensional parameterized and visually kinematic simulation module for the theoretical range of motion of total hip arthroplasty.
    Ji WT; Tao K; Wang CT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 20189695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer simulation of optimal lipped polyethylene liner orientation against prosthetic impingement.
    Hu Y; Zhou X; Qiao H; Zhu Z; Li H; Zhang J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):204. PubMed ID: 35379266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.