266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31947317)
1. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis.
Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Computational Modeling to Inform tDCS Electrode Montages for the Promotion of Language Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia.
Galletta EE; Cancelli A; Cottone C; Simonelli I; Tecchio F; Bikson M; Marangolo P
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26198364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Manoli Z; Parazzini M; Ravazzani P; Samaras T
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):262-271. PubMed ID: 28044315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of montages and electric currents in tDCS.
Khorrampanah M; Seyedarabi H; Daneshvar S; Farhoudi M
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Oct; 125():103998. PubMed ID: 33039799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an update in electric field modeling and investigations for optimal electrode montage.
da Silva RMF; Batistuzzo MC; Shavitt RG; Miguel EC; Stern E; Mezger E; Padberg F; D'Urso G; Brunoni AR
Expert Rev Neurother; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1025-1035. PubMed ID: 31244347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 131(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 31839398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of brain atrophy on tDCS and HD-tDCS current flow: a modeling study in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.
Unal G; Ficek B; Webster K; Shahabuddin S; Truong D; Hampstead B; Bikson M; Tsapkini K
Neurol Sci; 2020 Jul; 41(7):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 32040791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computation of group-level electric field in lower limb motor area for different tDCS montages.
Hamajima H; Gomez-Tames J; Uehara S; Otaka Y; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Jun; 150():69-78. PubMed ID: 37023635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control.
DaSilva AF; Truong DQ; DosSantos MF; Toback RL; Datta A; Bikson M
Front Neuroanat; 2015; 9():89. PubMed ID: 26236199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Focal Hemodynamic Responses in the Stimulated Hemisphere During High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Muthalib M; Besson P; Rothwell J; Perrey S
Neuromodulation; 2018 Jun; 21(4):348-354. PubMed ID: 28714545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Electrode Number on the Performance of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Wang Y; Zhou H; Li Y; Liu W
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():4182-4185. PubMed ID: 30441277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical Excitability through Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: a Computational Approach.
Arora Y; Chowdhury SR
J Med Syst; 2020 Jan; 44(2):48. PubMed ID: 31900599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How structural and functional MRI can inform dual-site tACS parameters: A case study in a clinical population and its pragmatic implications.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Bodurka J; Paulus MP; Ekhtiari H
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 35042056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.
Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M
Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Ramaraju S; Roula MA; McCarthy PW
J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016019. PubMed ID: 28925375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
