198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31947593)
1. Comparative Genomics Analysis of
Jia Y; Yang B; Ross P; Stanton C; Zhang H; Zhao J; Chen W
Genes (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31947593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Genomics Analysis of
Wang S; Yang B; Ross RP; Stanton C; Zhao J; Zhang H; Chen W
Genes (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31936280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lactobacillus paracasei comparative genomics: towards species pan-genome definition and exploitation of diversity.
Smokvina T; Wels M; Polka J; Chervaux C; Brisse S; Boekhorst J; van Hylckama Vlieg JE; Siezen RJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e68731. PubMed ID: 23894338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1 identifies potential niche-specific genes and pathways for gastrointestinal adaptation.
Valeriano VDV; Oh JK; Bagon BB; Kim H; Kang DK
Genomics; 2019 Jan; 111(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 29277352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus crispatus suggests novel mechanisms for the competitive exclusion of Gardnerella vaginalis.
Ojala T; Kankainen M; Castro J; Cerca N; Edelman S; Westerlund-Wikström B; Paulin L; Holm L; Auvinen P
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15():1070. PubMed ID: 25480015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phenotype-genotype analysis of Latilactobacills curvatus from different niches: Carbohydrate metabolism, antibiotic resistance, bacteriocin, phage fragments and linkages with CRISPR-Cas systems.
Yu L; Zang X; Chen Y; Gao Y; Pei Z; Yang B; Zhang H; Narbad A; Tian F; Zhai Q; Chen W
Food Res Int; 2022 Oct; 160():111640. PubMed ID: 36076376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Variable Regions of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Genomes Reveal the Dynamic Evolution of Metabolic and Host-Adaptation Repertoires.
Ceapa C; Davids M; Ritari J; Lambert J; Wels M; Douillard FP; Smokvina T; de Vos WM; Knol J; Kleerebezem M
Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Jul; 8(6):1889-905. PubMed ID: 27358423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 reveals its genetic adaptation and potential probiotic profiles.
Li P; Li X; Gu Q; Lou XY; Zhang XM; Song DF; Zhang C
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2016 Aug; 17(8):569-79. PubMed ID: 27487802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survey of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and their associated Cas proteins (CRISPR/Cas) systems in multiple sequenced strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Ostria-Hernández ML; Sánchez-Vallejo CJ; Ibarra JA; Castro-Escarpulli G
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Aug; 8():332. PubMed ID: 26238567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occurrence and activity of a type II CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus gasseri.
Sanozky-Dawes R; Selle K; O'Flaherty S; Klaenhammer T; Barrangou R
Microbiology (Reading); 2015 Sep; 161(9):1752-1761. PubMed ID: 26297561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated Phenotypic-Genotypic Analysis of
Chen Y; Li N; Zhao S; Zhang C; Qiao N; Duan H; Xiao Y; Yan B; Zhao J; Tian F; Zhai Q; Yu L; Chen W
Foods; 2021 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 34441495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extensive intra-phylotype diversity in lactobacilli and bifidobacteria from the honeybee gut.
Ellegaard KM; Tamarit D; Javelind E; Olofsson TC; Andersson SG; Vásquez A
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):284. PubMed ID: 25880915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey on the CRISPR arrays in Lactobacillus helveticus genomes.
Scaltriti E; Carminati D; Cortimiglia C; Ramoni R; Sørensen KI; Giraffa G; Zago M
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 May; 68(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 30762876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Genomic Analysis of
Lu W; Pei Z; Zang M; Lee YK; Zhao J; Chen W; Wang H; Zhang H
Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Xu J; Pei D; Nicholson A; Lan Y; Xia Q
mSphere; 2019 Apr; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30944210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Genomics and Specific Functional Characteristics Analysis of
Huang Z; Zhou X; Stanton C; Ross RP; Zhao J; Zhang H; Yang B; Chen W
Microorganisms; 2021 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 34576887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus curvatus enables prediction of traits relating to adaptation and strategies of assertiveness in sausage fermentation.
Eisenbach L; Janßen D; Ehrmann MA; Vogel RF
Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 286():37-47. PubMed ID: 30031987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis strains during wheat and rye sourdough fermentations by CRISPR locus length polymorphism PCR.
Rogalski E; Vogel RF; Ehrmann MA
Int J Food Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 316():108475. PubMed ID: 31874326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CRISPR Content Correlates with the Pathogenic Potential of Escherichia coli.
García-Gutiérrez E; Almendros C; Mojica FJ; Guzmán NM; García-Martínez J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131935. PubMed ID: 26136211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 and related members of Lactobacillus. spp reveal adaptations to dairy and gut environments.
Xing Z; Geng W; Li C; Sun Y; Wang Y
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12827. PubMed ID: 28993659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
