These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31948418)

  • 1. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dynamic three-dimensional CT analysis in detection of cam and pincer type femoroacetabular impingement.
    Röling MA; Mathijssen NMC; Bloem RM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 31948418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revisiting the Anteroinferior Iliac Spine: Is the Subspine Pathologic? A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation.
    Karns MR; Adeyemi TF; Stephens AR; Aoki SK; Beese ME; Salata MJ; Maak TG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1494-1502. PubMed ID: 29794857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Boschung A; Todorski IAS; Steppacher SD; Schmaranzer F; Zheng G; Ryan MK; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3120-3132. PubMed ID: 31539275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Location of Intra- and Extra-articular Hip Impingement Is Different in Patients With Pincer-Type and Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion or Protrusio Acetabuli on 3D CT-Based Impingement Simulation.
    Lerch TD; Siegfried M; Schmaranzer F; Leibold CS; Zurmühle CA; Hanke MS; Ryan MK; Steppacher SD; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):661-672. PubMed ID: 31961701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of pincer, cam, and combined deformities in Japanese hip joints evaluated with the Japanese Hip Society diagnostic guideline for femoroacetabular impingement: A CT-based study.
    Mimura T; Mori K; Itakura S; Furuya Y; Kawasaki T; Imai S
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 27720511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation of Hip Impingement and Range of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications for Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Degonda C; Schmaranzer F; Todorski I; Cullmann-Bastian J; Zheng G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 47(12):2966-2977. PubMed ID: 31486679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acetabular Rim Disorders/Pincer-type Femoroacetabular Impingement and Hip Arthroscopy.
    Larson CM; LaPrade RF; Floyd ER; McGaver RS; Bedi A
    Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2021 Mar; 29(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 33395229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology.
    Milone MT; Bedi A; Poultsides L; Magennis E; Byrd JW; Larson CM; Kelly BT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 471(8):2484-91. PubMed ID: 23361933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?
    Bouma HW; Hogervorst T; Audenaert E; Krekel P; van Kampen PM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1396-403. PubMed ID: 25384428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft Tissue Cam Impingement in Adolescents: MRI Reveals Impingement Lesions Underappreciated on Radiographs.
    Youngman TR; Johnson BL; Morris WZ; Montanez B; Serbin PA; Wagner KJ; Wilson PL; Alizai H; Ellis HB
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Dec; 51(14):3749-3755. PubMed ID: 37942655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) parameters comparing plain radiographs and advanced, 3D computed tomographic (CT)-generated hip models in a surgical patient cohort.
    Cadet ER; Babatunde OM; Gorroochurn P; Chan AK; Stancato-Pasik A; Brown M; Johnson S; Kaiser PB; Gardner TR; Ayeni OR
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jul; 24(7):2324-31. PubMed ID: 25257679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of MRI, CT, Dunn 45° and Dunn 90° alpha angle measurements in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Smith KM; Gerrie BJ; McCulloch PC; Lintner DM; Harris JD
    Hip Int; 2018 Jul; 28(4):450-455. PubMed ID: 29218683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.
    Mascarenhas VV; Rego P; Dantas P; Castro M; Jans L; Marques RM; Gouveia N; Soldado F; Ayeni OR; Consciência JG
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1609-1624. PubMed ID: 29110047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
    Wells J; Nepple JJ; Crook K; Ross JR; Bedi A; Schoenecker P; Clohisy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27752989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do plain radiographs correlate with CT for imaging of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement?
    Nepple JJ; Martel JM; Kim YJ; Zaltz I; Clohisy JC;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3313-20. PubMed ID: 22930210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior acetabular uptake on
    Oishi T; Kobayashi N; Choe H; Tezuka T; Kobayashi D; Higashihira S; Inaba Y
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(3):2309499019868929. PubMed ID: 31470763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial Commentary: Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Requires Dynamic Assessment of Beta-Angle (Femoroacetabular Excursion Angle) and Consideration of Femoral and Acetabular Version: Cam Impingement in Patients With Acetabular or Femoral Retroversion May Warrant Greater Osteoplasty.
    Carreira D; Kurapatti M
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Sep; 39(9):2023-2025. PubMed ID: 37543386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supine and Standing AP Pelvis Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Jackson TJ; Estess AA; Adamson GJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26913511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.
    Pascual-Garrido C; Li DJ; Grammatopoulos G; Yanik EL; Clohisy JC;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 30998630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.